Marks said:
Also a side note: I literally LMAO at anyone who used the single player as a reason they don't like CoD such as "Oh it has a boring short campaign", "it has a shit story...russians this, russians that", "its the same campaign every year"....etc..etc..etc Anyone with half a brain knows multiplayer is all that matters in CoD. I've owned the game since Day 1 and haven't even looked at the single player. I've done 1 or 2 games of Spec Ops survival, and the rest of my play time is online.
If you want a good single player go play Skyrim, Skyward Sword or Uncharted 3. Those are all games that are actually built around single player experience.
|
That's funny. I have been playing call of duty since mordern warfare, and modern warfare 2 was exactly the same. Exact. There were like some differences in killstreaks. And some weapon differences. Other than that, everything, the setting, gameplay, graphics, story (LOL) everything was same. Taking other games as example Uncharted single player has changed its setting with every entry, gears of war has improved its gameplay with sequels, battlefield has definitely improved its graphics with its sequel, skyrim, etc need I say more? Its call of duty's fault it is released every year to have changes as big as other games. Even then it hasn't changed much since modern warfare. That's just shameful.
I liked call of duty too, world at war is my favorite one.Oh, and the campaign in both modern warfare and world at war were pretty good, so if you are saying we shouldn't consider these games' single player experience into consideration, then you are wrong.