By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - why do people like to hate on the call of duty modern warfare games?

Turkish on 22 November 2011

I liked MW2, but then I discovered BF3 with destructions, vehicles and other stuff? I cant go back, I cant imagine any shooter without vehicles anymore.



Around the Network
Siko1989 on 22 November 2011

My reason is because its released every single year non stop when we dont need another game every year, i mean Acivision doesn't give ya a chance to have fun with the current COD game for a few years first. Its like Sports games but having them every year should be expected.




usrevenge on 22 November 2011

because Cod 4 was the last call of duty to bring anything new to the gaming world worth mentioning

Cod 4 was a pretty good game good singleplayer and multiplayer was fun.
WAW was a cod4 conversion mod broken guns, tanks are lame, maps were meh.
MW2 was a WaW conversion mod with broken killstreaks and lag and fail
Black ops was a MW2 conversion mod with broken weapons
MW3 is a MW2 clone with terrible maps, broken weapons, broken killstreaks, lag.

worst of all is time the game is fun
Cod 4 was at least 60 hours, anything fun for over 60 hours is a good game and worth the money u spent.
WaW was 20, because of zombies mostly
MW2 was lol 12 hours
black ops was 24 hours
MW3 was 12 hours



Marks on 22 November 2011
mantlepiecek said:
Marks said:
mantlepiecek said:
Marks said:


You think Call of Duty 4 and MW2 were the same? The graphics were a big improvement, all new perks plus pro perks, tons more killstreaks, new game modes (demolition, cap the flag, and a couple variations of older modes), host migration ability, more weapons, more attachments, the list goes on.

I'm not saying all of the above are good things, all I'm saying is you can't possibly think they were the exact same. If you were going to say any two CoD games are the same your best bet would be comparing MW3 and MW2. They are the most similar IMO. 

I don't know how much Call of Duty you've played in your life but if you actually play a lot you'd know every CoD plays differently online. In the beginning I tried to play MW3 the same way I played MW2 (and had a 3.00 k/d ratio) and the best I could get was a 1.70 k/d. Not that I really care about stats (besides winning) but it goes to show you can't play every CoD game the same way, you have to adapt. 

Do you want to know what exactly is a big improvement? Go look at uncharted 2 graphics and then compare it to uncharted 1. That is a big improvement. The change from modern warfare to modern warfare 2 was minimal. Demolition, more weapons are very minor changes to the game.

Yeah....graphics improvement. Without the hud you would think they are the same games.


Yeah 1 screenshot comparison isn't gonna do it justice. 

 

Try this instead:

 

You are talking to someone who has played both the games, just saying. 1 screenshot? The fact that they both look this similar proves that there hasn't been that much of a graphics improvement.

And LOL. Your video proves my point. Thanks. Those are very very minor changes. Especially taking into account that they were released 2 years apart from each other. I had to look at the corner to know which game I was looking at.


I guess we're just not going to be able to agree on this one :/

I'm not saying MW2 competes with the graphic juggernauts like Uncharted or God of War...but it definitely did look a lot sharper than CoD4 in my opinion. CoD4 was an amazing game but really doesn't look good anymore which is reasonable considering it's 4 years old, but IMO MW2 still looks as good as the average game that comes out nowadays and its 2 years old.