Some users are missing their last bits of credibility behaving like 5 year olds. Aldro, please, grow up.

I click on the threads because I love Uncharted also, Instead of real talk about the actual game all I see is bitching about the score.....iTS annoying!

From the moment i seen the teaser trailer last Dec i wanted to play this game because UC2 is my fav game this gen, besides VC. Frankly I don't care if meta scores this at 93 or 94 or even in this 80's. I am a fan of the franchise and ND. This whole create 4 different UC3 review threads to complain of 93 or 8/10 is just getting out of hand. Buy the game people, and give it a rest..

hey, im sure you plan on getting on this reall soon now, but i will remind you anyway.

you should update yo signature... its inaccurate

I'm gonna go out on a limb and say most people here don't care for g4's reviews but Adam Sessler (The only reviewer I truly listen to) made a pretty good point in his latest soapbox.

It's refreshing to hear. At the end of the day, all of us get caught up up in this numeral review war. If one site praises the game but doesn't immidiately give it that close to or perfect score, we flip our lid and we take personal offense for some reason, as suddenly a site like IGN goes from unreliable biased 360 fan boys to master site of game reviews. We, as gamers, are more hypocrites than the actual reviewers (they're also gamers, but you know what I mean :/ ) .

Post this video everywhere you can on this site.

So wait, game releases to you are just numbers on a review chartr  to say t the world my chosen console has a game or seris that is rated 1 poins higher on a 100 point based sytem than your consoles best this year. 

Do you think a 1 point diference is recognisible? 

So what if UC3 settles around 93 possibly 92. It as far as I'm concerned is the best frannchise Sony has  and is an amazing game. 

Do you think I'm upset because Forza 4 didnt get 95 instead of 91? Does 4 points on meta actually mean anything? 

I have 1 site apart from VGC that I use for reviews.( Although sadly VGC reviews tend to rabit on and never really agree wit manny points ) Giant Bomb is the only reviews I trrust. It was set up by the guy who left IGN due to IGN aving scores based on deals with advertising, when that fiasco kicked off. 

I only trust GB and  agree with the many tought provoking articles they write. :)

+1 :)

Uncharted will to some b the best series out there and many will be lucky enough to enjoy it. Its nice to see people like you enjoying and loving a series and its development.

I have that with Halo, Forza and Mass Effect. Gears Of War to. 

I would always buy the games regardless oof score, because I love them. I respect the developer and love teir work.

Who cares about a couple of meta points. Because I'm sure ND and Sony only really give a rats arse about how many copies it sells.

I really like GiantBomb, they are small enough that I feel like I can kinda get to know the team though their reviews, podcasts and videos, which is key for getting the most out of reviews. Killscreen also has some great reviews, unfortunatly they don't do as many as I would like.

For PC games there is also Rock, Paper, Shotgun if you could call what they do "reviews"