Dodece said: The Republican party is in the business of disenfranchising potential voters. It isn't a question of dissimilar values as is often the case with the Democratic party. The Republican party is the party of intolerance, and unsubtle bigotry. The reality is a negative agenda as opposed to a positive agenda is only going to discourage voters away, and that is sadly very fucking stupid. Especially when your key demographic is on the decline. I thought this would have actually had a impact on the parties mindset after the Obama landslide.
Instead of reviewing their positions, and trying to moderate their views. They instead opted to become even more extreme in their positions. As if their already polarized base weren't energized during the Obama election cycle. In truth they were Obama was their Anti-Christ. They were terrified by the man, and even with all that traction they still couldn't win that election. The super religiosity, bigoted rhetoric, and anti feminist stance. Is not the way for the party to move forward.
The truth is the Republican party is just doing a better job every year alienating more and more groups. That is just bad business, and prioritizing one demographics agenda so much isn't doing the party any favors. Religiosity is on the decline in this country, and frankly so is bigotry. Playing to a dying breed is like tethering yourself to a sinking ship. The party should have taken a cue to become more secular, and more focused on a fiscal platform. That in the end would have been more healthy and productive.
I think the modern Republican party is just farcical, and frankly it a shadow of better days. I would honestly like for the party to give me pause. Rather then cause me to turn away in disgust. Which would have happened if they had moved away from the evangelical propaganda, and focused on economics, national renewal, or a innovative new foreign doctrine. They had a justification to evolve to become a more dynamic party, and am I the only one that finds himself confused by the fact that the Democratic party that won that election is the only party that has seen fit to actually try courting new demographics.
Bottom line the Republican party needs to think real hard about opening doors rather then closing them, because frankly the Democratic party seems to be expanding its influence. I really would like for my vote to be contested in a meaningful way. The Republican party of forty years ago might have had a good chance at that, but the party of today is just plain toxic. |
Actually the biggest problem with the Republican party today is many of its leaders have gone "mushy". Instead of standing for fiscal responsibility, and smaller government they have over the last couple of decades become a light version of the democrats fiscally without standing on principal. The accusatoins that come from the left just call them: racist, sexist bigots. a small percentage of them possibly, but its evident that those things also come out as often oreven more from leftists than people on the right. Democrats have pushed even moreso over the years for a welfare state and a Marxist view that states, "Give to those according to their need FROM those according to their ability to contribute."
Much of the media dosn't do a very good job of telling what is actually transpiring, but what has happened moreso is that Democrats have gone more towards "socialistic views" and many Republicans have become more wishy washy and mushy choosing to not be fiscally responsible and they have not been pushing for a free market society as much where everyone has EQUAL opportunity. It's amazing to watch the "Occupy" crowd, because they are protesting Wall Street, but what they really should be protesting is the policies created by the government that helped create the mess.
When a society becomes so entitlement minded where it allows for its citizens to collect an income for so long without working its obvious that those people will become used to it and will feel that they don't have to work, because money is being provided to them for not working. That is not fair and is not right. Much of the political thinking has become so backwards. I just want the Government to live within its means and be fiscally responsible. The more they try to raise taxes the more burden it puts on the engine of the economy. Doesn't it make sense that the more money that is taken out of an economy the less money there is for economic growth?
I like many am tired of "establishment" politics and political figures that only care about re-election, but by no means do I want a welfare type state which implys less freedom and more economic bondage.