Well for most games I would agree with but there are 2 game franchises that I just can't get enough of and they are Mass Effect and Halo.

Seriously I don't think there is such a thing as "too much" when it comes to those 2 franchises (unless the releases were so frequent that I didn't have enough time to play them before the next one came out)

This, i think Ninty really mastered this, they make it so the fans have cottonmouth by the time a respective game comes out. 2 games per gen, in each franchise (mostly). But i think every two years is ok

What a shock, MS make games chiefly in order to make money. As opposed to other video game companies that hate money?

Fact is, they made a game that their fans like so much that they want it to be remade. They said they would make it if enough people wanted it. That's exactly how the VG industry works. You and I don't need to like Halo, but that doesn't mean that those who do are sheep, or being milked.

Additionally, l2n farm. You do not generally milk sheep.

What? Surely you gest sir! Halo: CEA is obviously just a quick cash in, I mean just look at it, it's obvious that no real work was done on the graphics front at all! Meanwhile Sony has been nice enough to grace us by just doing remastered ports of the God of War PSP games. And why did they decide to do this, you ask? Because they love us I say!

1 year gap or a 3 year gap has alot of vairables you have left out.  Halo typically has alot of map packs to help keep the game feeling fresh until the next game release for instance.  Otherwise, the campaign is all you have to play.  Without the online multi-player aspect of games like these there is not alot to stay excited over... If anything fans play because they like this genre and there's little else to sastisfy then.  So what most people play 'over and over' in FPS's like Halo and COD are the online multi-player games - not the campaign - And again the muli-player aspect is updated fairly frequently with map packs as well as sometimes monthly updates to multiplayer online games list ( types of games and changes in rules ) and tweaks to little things to keep online gaming fresh.. 

 So from a valid point of view.. Any game whether it be Uncharted, Halo, or COD could come out more often  .. every 2 yrs ( as Halo seems to be going - *2+ years between Reach and Halo 4* ) with less or no map packs.. With less or no map pack releases gamers would have to rely on a new game release for those maps instead ( this seems to be why COD comes out more often and it works for COD )... Faster releases lke this ( again with no map packs or fewer )  would bring a welcomed new campaign out sooner and more often ... Complete game releases  would now bring in fresh maps you are no longer getting as often as you did under 4 year releases of Halo like you did between Halo 2, 3 and Reach...  Alot of non-Halo fans like to throw in that Halo was released more often then every 4 yrs.. actually it wasnt.. Halo Wars was a completely different genre.. Halo Wars was not a first person shooter - It was a turned based 'Command and Conquer' board game on a console that used Halo pieces instead of knights and foot soldiers..  Halo ODST was originally supposed to be a downloadable expansion on Halo 3.. ( like the map packs ).. but it was so big it was decided it would be released on its own DVD and come with an additional DVD that contained ALL the map packs for those who had not already downloaded them... all this at a reduced price - since it was not a "full game" ... The next real installment of Halo, which is Halo 4, will be released about 2.5 yrs away from Reach, instead of the 4 year cycle.. 

Since well already know the graphics were completely updated to 2011 standards this is completely worthless  attempt of a non halo fan to anger others who want to buy a game they love.  By definition you should be banned for purposefully insitgating in a forum ..

Activision I think needs 3 large stuidos to release COD yearly.. 343i and MS have many recent videos and articles online stating releases may be ever 2 to 3 yrs, but they cant handle a yearly release via available manpower ..  If they did have yearly releases though they would cash in like COD has.. Instead of releasing map packs more often for refreshes to the game they would just be releasing the game with a new fresh campaign so map packs wouldnt be needed.. so yes the game would sell great on a yearly release.. again COD which does this.. People mainly play it for the online .. but with yearly releases campaigns would come faster making that a good thing.. HALO CEA only updates the graphics, not the engine ( except online part which uses Reach's engine ), and and 343i had help of another company that specializes in graphics to update Halo CEA's graphics.. so 343i didnt have to do nearly as much as they would've with Halo CEA.. they purposefully didnt touch the campaign engine as to not take away the gameplay the original fans loved about it..