By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
brendude13 said:
yo_john117 said:

Actually I am certain there will be a Halo game every year yet every Halo game will have more than 1 year of dev time simply because 343 studios is a rather large studio so each game will get the care it deserves (I am almost certain of that) and Halo fans get an awesome Halo game every year!

I wouldn't care if the games were great, one franchise entry per year is overkill.

Activision I think needs 3 large stuidos to release COD yearly.. 343i and MS have many recent videos and articles online stating releases may be ever 2 to 3 yrs, but they cant handle a yearly release via available manpower ..  If they did have yearly releases though they would cash in like COD has.. Instead of releasing map packs more often for refreshes to the game they would just be releasing the game with a new fresh campaign so map packs wouldnt be needed.. so yes the game would sell great on a yearly release.. again COD which does this.. People mainly play it for the online .. but with yearly releases campaigns would come faster making that a good thing.. HALO CEA only updates the graphics, not the engine ( except online part which uses Reach's engine ), and and 343i had help of another company that specializes in graphics to update Halo CEA's graphics.. so 343i didnt have to do nearly as much as they would've with Halo CEA.. they purposefully didnt touch the campaign engine as to not take away the gameplay the original fans loved about it..