ShadowSoldier said:
To this day...it boggles my mind why Microsoft didn't make that move for Bioware..especially since Bioware made so many excellent exclusive titles for MS |
They seem to be doing fine enough so far
ShadowSoldier said:
To this day...it boggles my mind why Microsoft didn't make that move for Bioware..especially since Bioware made so many excellent exclusive titles for MS |
They seem to be doing fine enough so far
I always thought Sucker Punch would be a great fit for Sony. Now that means even more exclusive PS3 games.
It's time they started buying up some Japanese developers to make JRPGs.
Jay520 said:
I have my theories for Starhawk and Twisted Metal, but I'll keep those to myself as I know how you don't like "if's and maybe's" |
Maybe we share the same theory. I think Starhawk will initially sell not so good, but word of mouth will grant this title amazing legs.
updated: 14.01.2012
playing right now: Xenoblade Chronicles
Hype-o-meter, from least to most hyped: the Last Story, Twisted Metal, Mass Effect 3, Final Fantasy XIII-2, Final Fantasy Versus XIII, Playstation ViTA
bet with Mordred11 that Rage will look better on Xbox 360.
CGI-Quality said:
I disagree heavily with that. In fact, that's been Sony's strong suit; they ARE associated with quality. A better look at it would be to say not everyone affiliates some of the PS3's quality exclusives with SCE, and only because they don't make it as apparent as Nintendo does with their in-house studios. Nevertheless, Sony has always bought 2-3 devs close to the end of any generation. This is following that pattern. |
People who frequent gaming forums like us do associate Sony with quality gaming. But if you ask my uncle or my cousin they don't. They do know Nintendo, though. I have the feeling that this is true for many people, they don't say 'hey, it's a Sony game!'
I think they should make their brand better known.
No troll is too much for me to handle. I rehabilitate trolls, I train people. I am the Troll Whisperer.
Silver-Tiger said: ?
|
I see something like 3 - 400k FW and maybe 1.8 - 2.2m lifetime.
Silver-Tiger said:
|
How come you think Starhawk won't initially sell good?
Jay520 said:
|
Bioware is fine. Microsoft lost a lot of secure quality titles they couldve had and had ownership to the IP's.
Waste of money....unless there's a rocket robot on wheels PSN remake.
ElGranCabeza said: Waste of money....unless there's a rocket robot on wheels PSN remake. |
No, the dev will most likely be granted an increased budget for their future games.
maverick40 said:
The fact that if someone is a writer on a videogame website, you think he might actually know the goings on in the industry. There was no indication that they were 1st party either....ever. |
Actually they were effectively working as a 2nd party developer since 2001, they signed a deal with Sony after their first game and all their following games were Sony owned properties. Sony funded their games and owned the IPs.