MGS4 and KZ2 will probably come out next year . Home will push some sistems to , but Im not shure that FFXIII will be able to come out next year :(
Vote the Mayor for Mayor!
ps3 and wii's lineups are looking good! and not all the games coming out on wii are 1st party! (only 3 which will be mega sellers: mkwii brawl and wiifit!!!!!
Damn things have changed since 2009 began. Here are my new visions for the end of the generation.
Wii: 135 mil
Ps3: 85 mil
360: 60 mil
@Hunter alien
What do you mean dude? MGS4 for 09 and KZ2 for 09, and wtf FF XIII for 2010?
Haze??
==> http://shop.ubi.com/Prod_ExtDesc.asp?catalogid=576
http://kotaku.com/338322/pre+order-haze-for-your-bonus-drug-paraphenalia
JANUARY 08
littlebigplanet??
==> I expect late 2008 or ealr 2009
L.A. Noire ?
==> no one expected it for 2008,
they are too busy with GTA4 ...
.. MGS4 ?.
==> http://www.psu.com/Gamestop-now-taking-reservations-for-MGS4-News--a0002272-p0.php
June 08.
killzone 2
==> I predict xmas 2008 or early 2009
NOTE : I agree that there are a lot of delayed games on the PS3 (just look at Home/LBP/KZ2)
Time to Work !
CAL4M1TY,
there was a demo of KZ2 and some people have played it.
Garcian Smith,
KZ2 gameplay is last gen ?
Like CoD4 gameplay, Halo3 gameplay, HL2 gameplay
all FPS gameplay are last gen
the difference between them is basically the immersion feeling, the story, the art design,
for me, from what I have seen heard, gameplay difference between FPS are minor
Time to Work !
Dude, I understand your rant. And I follow the same kind of annoyance about what Sony is doing.
Seriously, I have no clue where their management lies in priorities if they keep delaying games.
And there's no joke about it. What the fuck is Sony doing?
Nintendo & Sony supporter:
Consoles: Wii & PS3.
I think that the 360 will have the better lineup for the beginning of the year--Lost Odyssey, Kingdom Under Fire, GTA4 w/exclusive Content....BUT once summer comes, it is ps3 ALL THE WAY TIL CHRISTMAS....I love all three consoles, but wow, delays or not, come Oct-Dec, ps3 will have some majorly sweet games bombarding people!!!
Well, I now only have access to a PS3 & 360...Plan on buying a wii soon (lol, if I can ever find one available!) but will probably wait until some of the major RPG's come out like Dragon Quest & Tales, etc.
Anyhow, I'm so far behind in games to play that I'm not in a huge hurry (lol, haven't even gotten a chance to finish God of War II yet!)
I would have to say in response to the question the definitive answer would be no. The problem is two fold the first problem is the propensity by some to label every large budget exclusive PS3 game as cash in the bank. The second problem is our inability to compare lineups.
There is a propensity for PS3 loyalists to label any game with a large budget that happens to be exclusive to the PS3 as magnificent. The reality however is not so kind spending a lot of money, and having a known franchise does not equal a killer game. Every game listed so far could flop even Metal Gear or Final Fantasy could fail in epic fashion. These games are not money in the bank.
The second problem is the unknown future. We have very little guidance on what Nintendo, Microsoft, and third parties have planned for this year. We have a good idea of what we will see from Sony. They had to sell consumers on the future. Nobody else had to so they focused on what they had.
Nintendo and Microsoft's exclusive lineup for the second half of this year is a giant white blank on the calender. Hard to compare the lineups when two of the players are being very tight lipped. What I am seeing is Sony doesn't have the volume to make that a moot point let me explain. What happens if both Nintendo and Microsoft say in a month unveil a dozen strong exclusives of their own. Where does that put Sony.
From Nintendo I expect to see the following. Starfox, WaveRace, Pilotwings, Donkey Kong, Disaster, Zelda, and Pokemon. Just their first party efforts mind you. Yes we are due for another Zelda. Disaster supposedly is still in development. Pilotwings, WaveRace, and Starfox are mainstays of their consoles. Pokemon is a given money maker, and Donkey Kong is bound to be the next platformer. To me that is probably what Nintendo's answer to the Sony lineup will be along with Smash, and Mario Kart.
From Microsoft I expect a slew of new intellectual properties. Really its a big mystery what they have boiling. Hopefully they give us a hint hopefully soon. However I think its a safe bet we will see somewhere around ten strong exclusive titles. We just do not have a clue.
I think once Nintendo, and Microsoft start to parade what they have planned the Sony lineup probably will not look as strong as many think. Until then all we have is a third of the story, and some people trying to say thats all we need.
CAL4M1TY said:
I was not aware that they allowed for public hands-on time with KZ2 at E3 last year (EDIT: forgot it's 08 already) About Killzone: Liberation, it was a good game, but one game doesn't make a quality franchise, that's never been the case in the history of gaming. Take for example God of War 2, so many people were sceptical about it before it's release, because they thought the developer would slump after the awesome-ness that was the first game. Then there's also the issue with history, of the 2 two killzone games released so far, the good one was not the FPS. I'm not telling you to not be psyched for KZ2, but you have to put it into perspective, if you over hype it, it'll turn into another Heavenly Sword fiasco (a decent/good game that is portrayed as a crap game because it didn't live up to expectation/"hype") |
I thought they let a few people have controller time behind closed doors, but those were big members of the press. However, I doubt they let someone from the public/kid working for an online mag see anything more than all the E3 stuff thats been online for ages.
Regardless, this is a fruitless argument. He'll probably retort with a "console FPS all suck, PC ftw" mentality then go on to cite how Killzone is somehow different - likely relying on the budget involved, number of people working on it and technology. In this case just bring up Dai Katana and Trespasser.
Other than that, I agree with your post whole-heartedly. Liberation was fun, but not mind-blowing. The game quickly got repetitive, which seems to be a theme common in all three of Guerillas games.
Leo-j said: If a dvd for a pc game holds what? Crysis at 3000p or something, why in the world cant a blu-ray disc do the same?
ssj12 said: Player specific decoders are nothing more than specialized GPUs. Gran Turismo is the trust driving simulator of them all.
"Why do they call it the xbox 360? Because when you see it, you'll turn 360 degrees and walk away"
| Dodece said: I would have to say in response to the question the definitive answer would be no. The problem is two fold the first problem is the propensity by some to label every large budget exclusive PS3 game as cash in the bank. The second problem is our inability to compare lineups. There is a propensity for PS3 loyalists to label any game with a large budget that happens to be exclusive to the PS3 as magnificent. The reality however is not so kind spending a lot of money, and having a known franchise does not equal a killer game. Every game listed so far could flop even Metal Gear or Final Fantasy could fail in epic fashion. These games are not money in the bank. The second problem is the unknown future. We have very little guidance on what Nintendo, Microsoft, and third parties have planned for this year. We have a good idea of what we will see from Sony. They had to sell consumers on the future. Nobody else had to so they focused on what they had. Nintendo and Microsoft's exclusive lineup for the second half of this year is a giant white blank on the calender. Hard to compare the lineups when two of the players are being very tight lipped. What I am seeing is Sony doesn't have the volume to make that a moot point let me explain. What happens if both Nintendo and Microsoft say in a month unveil a dozen strong exclusives of their own. Where does that put Sony. From Nintendo I expect to see the following. Starfox, WaveRace, Pilotwings, Donkey Kong, Disaster, Zelda, and Pokemon. Just their first party efforts mind you. Yes we are due for another Zelda. Disaster supposedly is still in development. Pilotwings, WaveRace, and Starfox are mainstays of their consoles. Pokemon is a given money maker, and Donkey Kong is bound to be the next platformer. To me that is probably what Nintendo's answer to the Sony lineup will be along with Smash, and Mario Kart. From Microsoft I expect a slew of new intellectual properties. Really its a big mystery what they have boiling. Hopefully they give us a hint hopefully soon. However I think its a safe bet we will see somewhere around ten strong exclusive titles. We just do not have a clue. I think once Nintendo, and Microsoft start to parade what they have planned the Sony lineup probably will not look as strong as many think. Until then all we have is a third of the story, and some people trying to say thats all we need. |
Well, I would like to point out how a handful of small changes in the line-ups of the PS3 and XBox 360 could drastically impact who has the best line-up. Imagine you made a list of the 24 best games comming to the PS3 and XBox 360 in 2008, and (for argument sake) it worked out that 14 of these games were multiplatform and 10 were exclusive. Lets also assume that the PS3's exclusive games are bigger better know franchises and that the PS3 has (generally speaking) a much better line-up.
Now suppose that 1 of the PS3's exclusive game got delayed, 1 exclusive game went multiplatform, 1 exclusive game was far worse than expected, 2 previous multiplatform games became XBox 360 exclusive, and Microsoft introuduced 2 high quality exclusive games; how great would the PS3's line-up look then?
This is (really) the problem with claiming victory 12 months in advance ...
If you look 6 weeks into the future you should have a pretty good idea of what will actually be released and how well it will actually perform; in this market, at this time, looking 12 months into the future is impossible.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2026 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
, wait, it was only a game-play trailer? Like I said, you have yet to play the real thing, yes you can comment about the graphic, thats fine, but the BEST FPS is not just about pretty graphics. More important is how the first person controls handle, which no one knows yet because no one has played it. Then there's also the issue with AI, what's the point of claiming a game to be the best FPS if the AI isn't clever enough to react to you shooting it. Another aspect of claiming a title to be the best is if it brings something different to the table, you cannot legimately claim that there is anything new in KZ2.
