Bad game gets bad review. More at 11. Back to you in the studio, Diane.
Bad game gets bad review. More at 11. Back to you in the studio, Diane.
| Pjams said: If F is a 59 or lower then that's in line with many other reviews. |
F is 10/100 or 1/10.
pathetic state of reviews this gen...SHOCK!

In-Kat-We-Trust Brigade!
"This world is Merciless, and it's also very beautiful"
For All News/Info related to the PlayStation Vita, Come and join us in the Official PSV Thread!
| Pjams said: If F is a 59 or lower then that's in line with many other reviews. |
An F in my university is < 25 percent. E < 40.
Theres no way on gods green earth that DNF is as bad as this review suggests.
Having completed it 2 times, and then gone back in a third time to get my achievements to 49/50, i have to say that the humour and attention to detail (not graphically of course, just whats around you to interact with ect) are superb.
The guys and gals who worked on this game deserve far better than a BS review score like this, hang your head in shame 1DOWN.
Sounds like attention whoring. I'm shocked that a game reviewer would resort to such tactics. Just flabbergasted.
I don't know who to trust anymore. The 10:00 news? My mother? My world has turned upside down today, the day videogame journalism died.
At least I was right about one thing: Duke Nukem Forever was more fun as a neverending joke than it is as finished product.

"The worst part about these reviews is they are [subjective]--and their scores often depend on how drunk you got the media at a Street Fighter event." — Mona Hamilton, Capcom Senior VP of Marketing
*Image indefinitely borrowed from BrainBoxLtd without his consent.
Mr Khan said:
Wtf? That sounds like something out of a bad hentai movie... |
Which is good, right?
Farmageddon said:
Which is good, right? |
It means if it were a hentai i'd totally watch it, but i'd find it discomfiting in a video game...

Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.
@endimion
Are you for real. Your the one advocating for censorship. I am advocating for the right of a reviewer to take a moral stance on games that they review. Which obviously a great many of them are. This reviewer has every right to deny this game anything that constitutes an endorsement. A reviewer is not obligated to be a mindless automaton. They are not machines. They have the right to make judgement calls, and tough shit for you if you don't like that. You can exercise your freedom by choosing to ignore them, or by not using their services in the future.
I can't believe this game is getting panned like this. Its actually not that bad at all... Is 1up that big of a media attention whore, they have to resort to this? Maybe their advertising revenue is down and they have to generate traffic?