By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - Women gets to drip acid into a mans eyes by court rule

vlad321 on 14 May 2011
sapphi_snake said:
vlad321 said:

I fully agree, and I think the judgement was completely fair. I too use to think that the whole "eye for an eye" was a terrible idea and too barbaric. However after putting some more thought about it. I think "an eye for two" is actually a much better world.

Plus it compeletely defeats the laughable "an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind" because with it the people who don't deserve to be alive will be blind far sooner than any of the others.

Yes, shame on Ghandi for saying something like that (even though seems like it's literally true in this case).

Well he was right. That's why it's an eye for two. Then the bastards can't do shit anymore and might as well just die off. Sadly in this case the guy doesn't have 4 eyes to get removed. They should have compensated with something else to make up for it.



Tag(thx fkusumot) - "Yet again I completely fail to see your point..."

HD vs Wii, PC vs HD: http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=93374

Why Regenerating Health is a crap game mechanic: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3986420

gamrReview's broken review scores: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4170835

 

Around the Network
Baalzamon on 14 May 2011
vlad321 said:
sapphi_snake said:
vlad321 said:

I fully agree, and I think the judgement was completely fair. I too use to think that the whole "eye for an eye" was a terrible idea and too barbaric. However after putting some more thought about it. I think "an eye for two" is actually a much better world.

Plus it compeletely defeats the laughable "an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind" because with it the people who don't deserve to be alive will be blind far sooner than any of the others.

Yes, shame on Ghandi for saying something like that (even though seems like it's literally true in this case).

Well he was right. That's why it's an eye for two. Then the bastards can't do shit anymore and might as well just die off. Sadly in this case the guy doesn't have 4 eyes to get removed. They should have compensated with something else to make up for it.

Cut his peepee off



Money can't buy happiness. Just video games, which make me happy.

sapphi_snake on 14 May 2011
vlad321 said:
sapphi_snake said:
vlad321 said:

I fully agree, and I think the judgement was completely fair. I too use to think that the whole "eye for an eye" was a terrible idea and too barbaric. However after putting some more thought about it. I think "an eye for two" is actually a much better world.

Plus it compeletely defeats the laughable "an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind" because with it the people who don't deserve to be alive will be blind far sooner than any of the others.

Yes, shame on Ghandi for saying something like that (even though seems like it's literally true in this case).

Well he was right. That's why it's an eye for two. Then the bastards can't do shit anymore and might as well just die off. Sadly in this case the guy doesn't have 4 eyes to get removed. They should have compensated with something else to make up for it.

Oh, the insanity!!!



"I don't understand how someone could like Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky, but not like Twilight!!!"

"Last book I read was Brokeback Mountain, I just don't have the patience for them unless it's softcore porn."

                                                                               (The Voice of a Generation and Seece)

"If you cant stand the sound of your own voice than dont become a singer !!!!!"

                                                                               (pizzahut451)

sapphi_snake on 14 May 2011
Baalzamon said:
vlad321 said:
sapphi_snake said:
vlad321 said:

I fully agree, and I think the judgement was completely fair. I too use to think that the whole "eye for an eye" was a terrible idea and too barbaric. However after putting some more thought about it. I think "an eye for two" is actually a much better world.

Plus it compeletely defeats the laughable "an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind" because with it the people who don't deserve to be alive will be blind far sooner than any of the others.

Yes, shame on Ghandi for saying something like that (even though seems like it's literally true in this case).

Well he was right. That's why it's an eye for two. Then the bastards can't do shit anymore and might as well just die off. Sadly in this case the guy doesn't have 4 eyes to get removed. They should have compensated with something else to make up for it.

Cut his peepee off

What are you, a 5-year-old?



"I don't understand how someone could like Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky, but not like Twilight!!!"

"Last book I read was Brokeback Mountain, I just don't have the patience for them unless it's softcore porn."

                                                                               (The Voice of a Generation and Seece)

"If you cant stand the sound of your own voice than dont become a singer !!!!!"

                                                                               (pizzahut451)

Baalzamon on 14 May 2011
sapphi_snake said:
Baalzamon said:

Cut his peepee off

What are you, a 5-year-old?

What are you Sapphi, mature?  Acting like a little kid is fun sometimes



Money can't buy happiness. Just video games, which make me happy.

Around the Network
Porcupine_I on 14 May 2011
sapphi_snake said:
vlad321 said:

I fully agree, and I think the judgement was completely fair. I too use to think that the whole "eye for an eye" was a terrible idea and too barbaric. However after putting some more thought about it. I think "an eye for two" is actually a much better world.

Plus it compeletely defeats the laughable "an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind" because with it the people who don't deserve to be alive will be blind far sooner than any of the others.

Yes, shame on Ghandi for saying something like that (even though seems like it's literally true in this case).

actually the biblical "eye for an eye" was a demand for restraint.

it was supposed to say you should only revenge with the same amount, and not act worse than has been done to you.



“It appeared that there had even been demonstrations to thank Big Brother for raising the chocolate ration to twenty grams a week. And only yesterday, he reflected, it had been announced that the ration was to be reduced to twenty grams a week. Was it possible that they could swallow that, after only twenty-four hours? Yes, they swallowed it.”

- George Orwell, ‘1984’

radiantshadow92 on 14 May 2011

sounds fair to me.



sapphi_snake on 14 May 2011
Porcupine_I said:
sapphi_snake said:
vlad321 said:

I fully agree, and I think the judgement was completely fair. I too use to think that the whole "eye for an eye" was a terrible idea and too barbaric. However after putting some more thought about it. I think "an eye for two" is actually a much better world.

Plus it compeletely defeats the laughable "an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind" because with it the people who don't deserve to be alive will be blind far sooner than any of the others.

Yes, shame on Ghandi for saying something like that (even though seems like it's literally true in this case).

actually the biblical "eye for an eye" was a demand for restraint.

it was supposed to say you should only revenge with the same amount, and not act worse than has been done to you.

I knew that, but I misread the article. Anyways, both the biblical passage and this Sharia Law thing are bad.



"I don't understand how someone could like Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky, but not like Twilight!!!"

"Last book I read was Brokeback Mountain, I just don't have the patience for them unless it's softcore porn."

                                                                               (The Voice of a Generation and Seece)

"If you cant stand the sound of your own voice than dont become a singer !!!!!"

                                                                               (pizzahut451)

vlad321 on 14 May 2011
Porcupine_I said:
sapphi_snake said:
vlad321 said:

I fully agree, and I think the judgement was completely fair. I too use to think that the whole "eye for an eye" was a terrible idea and too barbaric. However after putting some more thought about it. I think "an eye for two" is actually a much better world.

Plus it compeletely defeats the laughable "an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind" because with it the people who don't deserve to be alive will be blind far sooner than any of the others.

Yes, shame on Ghandi for saying something like that (even though seems like it's literally true in this case).

actually the biblical "eye for an eye" was a demand for restraint.

it was supposed to say you should only revenge with the same amount, and not act worse than has been done to you.

The problem with that is that there are two parts to every human action, the purpose and the consequence. Jusst equal damage, or less, is what happens when you consider the consequences. Basically leaving the whole part about the purpose unpunished. People's purpose should be punishable just as much as the consequences of their actions. 



Tag(thx fkusumot) - "Yet again I completely fail to see your point..."

HD vs Wii, PC vs HD: http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=93374

Why Regenerating Health is a crap game mechanic: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3986420

gamrReview's broken review scores: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4170835

 

highwaystar101 on 14 May 2011
Porcupine_I said:



Majid was quoted as saying he did not regret his action but added: "I threw acid on her face so that she would be mine forever.


The man doesn't need acid dripped in his eye, he needs psychiatric help. This kind of attitude is just sociopathic. Seriously.