By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
sapphi_snake on 14 May 2011
Edit Thread
vlad321 said:
sapphi_snake said:
vlad321 said:

I fully agree, and I think the judgement was completely fair. I too use to think that the whole "eye for an eye" was a terrible idea and too barbaric. However after putting some more thought about it. I think "an eye for two" is actually a much better world.

Plus it compeletely defeats the laughable "an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind" because with it the people who don't deserve to be alive will be blind far sooner than any of the others.

Yes, shame on Ghandi for saying something like that (even though seems like it's literally true in this case).

Well he was right. That's why it's an eye for two. Then the bastards can't do shit anymore and might as well just die off. Sadly in this case the guy doesn't have 4 eyes to get removed. They should have compensated with something else to make up for it.

Oh, the insanity!!!



"I don't understand how someone could like Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky, but not like Twilight!!!"

"Last book I read was Brokeback Mountain, I just don't have the patience for them unless it's softcore porn."

                                                                               (The Voice of a Generation and Seece)

"If you cant stand the sound of your own voice than dont become a singer !!!!!"

                                                                               (pizzahut451)