By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Which One Is Worse? RROD vs. PSN

Well, it depends who's at fault. While the PSN obviously didn't have the security to keep anon out, would you blame someone for having their house broken into even when they shut their windows and locked their doors?  I think it's incredibly unfair to blame Sony becuase an outside force attacked them and succeeded.  Anonymous and whoever else is responsible for this made a conscious decision to hack the system and leak the information. the fact of the matter is that it was THEIR fault.  

the RRoD was Microsoft's fault for putting out a shoddy console.  

completely different situations.  Which is worse from a company angle?  definitely red ring.  which is worse from a consumer angle?  probably the PSN thing, but only becuase of the identity stuff, the PSN being down is a nonissue. 

I still think its unfair to hate on Sony becuase an outside force had to use all their abilities to hack their system. Don't people know how hackers work?  if they wanted to, they could get access to XBL just as easily, and have in the past if I'm not mistaken. 



My Console Library:

PS5, Switch, XSX

PS4, PS3, PS2, PS1, WiiU, Wii, GCN, N64 SNES, XBO, 360

3DS, DS, GBA, Vita, PSP, Android

Around the Network

That's like asking whether you'd rather be shot or stabbed to death.  RROD and the PSN outage are both pretty shameful and annoying.



wfz said:

Considering XBL Gold is 60 bucks a year now at most, I think it's safe to assume that having to go days/weeks without a console ENTIRELY while it is broken is far worse than not being able to access online for a month. Buying a new console and waiting days/weeks to be able to play it is far more costly than simply not being able to access online features. A month without WoW is $15 --  a week without a console while having to buy a new console is $300 plus.

Having your console break is much worse for the individual. On the other hand, as far as amount of people affected and on the industry as a whole (consumers and developers) I agree the PSN outage is far worse.

Actually, whenever you get the RRoD and send it in to MS you get a free month of Live. And last time I got RRoD it only took 3 days till I got my console back(not mine, but whatever)



Sig thanks to Saber! :D 

Runa216 said:

Well, it depends who's at fault. While the PSN obviously didn't have the security to keep anon out, would you blame someone for having their house broken into even when they shut their windows and locked their doors?  I think it's incredibly unfair to blame Sony becuase an outside force attacked them and succeeded.  Anonymous and whoever else is responsible for this made a conscious decision to hack the system and leak the information. the fact of the matter is that it was THEIR fault.  

the RRoD was Microsoft's fault for putting out a shoddy console.  

completely different situations.  Which is worse from a company angle?  definitely red ring.  which is worse from a consumer angle?  probably the PSN thing, but only becuase of the identity stuff, the PSN being down is a nonissue. 

I still think its unfair to hate on Sony becuase an outside force had to use all their abilities to hack their system. Don't people know how hackers work?  if they wanted to, they could get access to XBL just as easily, and have in the past if I'm not mistaken. 

I totally get what you are saying, and I almost agree with you.  You can't fault them for being hacked.  They had security measures in place but everyone knows that eventually, if they are determined enough, hackers are going to win.  I don't think it's that big a deal that they got hacked in the first place.  What is a big deal is how ridiculously long it has taken them to deal with the situation and how badly they have botched the PR aspect of it.  How did they not have some sort of plan in place for a contingency like this?  On top of that they went and made promises they couldn't keep about when the service would be back up before they even knew all the details of the situation.

To use your analogy, no one would fault you if a burglar smashed your window, broke in, and robbed you.  But if you leave the broken window shards laying on the floor, tell your wife you're gonna call a repair guy in 5 minutes, and then wait 17 days while the wind blows through the window, you are kind of stupid.



Kenryoku_Maxis said:

A RROD kills your entire system so you can't play games.  And has been a consistent problem overe the entire course of the XBOX360.

PSN just doesn't allow you to utilize the online features of your PS3.  But you can still play single player games.  And its only been about 2 weeks of downtime, which is less than whatyou'd be down sending your XBNOX360 in for 'repairs'.  Especially if your XBOX360 has died 3-5 times like many people.

I don't know why people keep making this thread.  2 Weeks vs 6 years of problems is pretty easy to compare.


What about your info and trust for the company to protect your information? I agree RROD is worse but I also think people that are not hardcore, Look at this issue as a major problem.



Around the Network
demonfox13 said:

This thread smells like a fanboy war waiting to happen (if it hasn't already). It won't be long before I see Nsanity and maybe Selnor, Seece and Disolitude post here (I haven't read the other pages). Both are bad in their own way. RROD was a problem that lasted years and I believe that should have gotten more media coverage, but Microsoft is the sweetheart of the USA (although the hicks don't seem to realize the consoles are made in China). The PSN being down is a temporary problem to varying degrees solely dependant on the user. The service isn't a paid service like Live so that mitigates some of it. Personally I jump between being in online and offline mode. Right now I bought Killzone 1! So I went back and played that (love my MGS4 80gb b/c bundle hehe). Also playing Lords of Shadow.

P.S. Disolitude if you take the time to read this, you should give Lords of Shadow another chance. It does feel like a Castlevania game as you get deeper in. I understand your love for 2D Castlevania and trust me, I have 2 versions of SOTN but LoS stands well on its own. When you get to the vampire area it truly feels more and more Castlevania'ish, it just has that charm to it. 2 Hours into LoS does not do the whole game justice trust me. I personally thought Lament of Innocence was good for a 3D Castlevania but LoS does well on its own if you give it a fair shake. Don't go in with your Alucard SOTN bias and truly give it a fair shake man, I guarantee you will find the charm within a few hours. Not to mention it is a lengthy game. I guess you can compare it to Nier, the beginning was meh, but later on the game stretches its wings.


RROD got a whole sh=t load of attention, What are you talking about? They had to put down a billion dollars because of it. So your idea that it didn't get covered is just a joke. plus this psn outage effects everyone and not just random people who got a answer exactly what to do and where to do it.  So I agree RROD is worse just because of the media attention and non playing issue but MS handled it like a pro and made sure the customer was taken care of.

 

As far as calling out people on this site as fanboys. I think you should be banned.



Something no one brought up was that this outage effects everyone on the PSN network. Thats a hell a lot more then what RROD effected. So I think we would have to take that into consideration as well. I think RROD is worse because it had a lot of attention, actually non stop attention. you couldn't go on any of these sites without two articles claiming this or that. Yahoo had it. Local news , all over the place. Rightfully so that it should be that way. MS Screwed up but I think handled it like a pro. Fixed the problem and saved the most detrimental console issue to date from being a massive snowball effect.

So I think only time will tell but new buyers well be the people asking about the security of the psn network and they should, as they should ask if MS fixed there problem.  So it comes down to how Sony handle's this and to me they have done a horrible job.  Thats where it counts. Just like the ps2 issue's, thats another issue they never acknoledged. One reason why I think so many ended up going to xbox this gen.



dsister said:
wfz said:

Considering XBL Gold is 60 bucks a year now at most, I think it's safe to assume that having to go days/weeks without a console ENTIRELY while it is broken is far worse than not being able to access online for a month. Buying a new console and waiting days/weeks to be able to play it is far more costly than simply not being able to access online features. A month without WoW is $15 --  a week without a console while having to buy a new console is $300 plus.

Having your console break is much worse for the individual. On the other hand, as far as amount of people affected and on the industry as a whole (consumers and developers) I agree the PSN outage is far worse.

Actually, whenever you get the RRoD and send it in to MS you get a free month of Live. And last time I got RRoD it only took 3 days till I got my console back(not mine, but whatever)

Really? I never heard about that free month of Live deal. All I heard back in the early years were people getting RRoD, shipping their consoles to Microsoft, and getting a new or refurbished one back a week or more later. I also remember a lot of people just buying new consoles and having to pay a lot out of pocket over this whole debacle. Then in 08 or so they upped their service as far as I recall.

Did you not have to pay a single dime when dealing with your RRoD? What years did this happen for you?



wfz said:

Really? I never heard about that free month of Live deal. All I heard back in the early years were people getting RRoD, shipping their consoles to Microsoft, and getting a new or refurbished one back a week or more later. I also remember a lot of people just buying new consoles and having to pay a lot out of pocket over this whole debacle. Then in 08 or so they upped their service as far as I recall.

Did you not have to pay a single dime when dealing with your RRoD? What years did this happen for you?


It changed somewhere in there. When there were a lot of people with RRoD it took awhile a longer and was completely free for you(Took me about two weeks in 06 and 07). A little faster in 08. Then sometime in '10 (I believe) they changed it so you sent it in(You have to pay for the box if you didn't have one, they still paid for shipping), and it only took a couple days at most. 

And for as long as I can remember they always sent you a free month of Live 

Edit: I should explain more. When it first started they sent you a box, but to make it faster they stopped that, and you were in charge of finding a box and whatnot 



Sig thanks to Saber! :D 

question.  how did RROD affect other companies.

there is a topic about capcom loosing hundreds of thousands of dollars or even millions.  Did RROD do that to them?

If i was to look at RROD I would imagine all it did was annoy customers that it affected and made microsoft have to spend lots of money fixing it.  i'm sure it acutally created some jobs fixing.

yes psn probably created a few jobs fixing as well, BUT it affected more than just sony, unlike RROD only affected microsoft.

With PSN down, companies are not making money on psn games.  They still have psn employees tha thtey have to pay, or else NOT pay.  So there are two cases 

1. ZERO revenue expenses 

2. Zero revenue and no expenses,  but in the case of no expenses it means all those employees that work on their psn stuff are making zero income during the psn outage.  so for a month or more all these employees are jobless.  

you guys have to quit being so selfish and thinking only of you.  in terms of consumer, neihter is really anythign to give a shit about.  "ooh dang, i have no online for a couple weeks or no xbox for a couple weeks"  there is no cost to you.

BUT PSN is costing other companies hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars in missed revenue and in expenses.