By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Crysis 2 - PS3 vs 360 performance comparison

Ping_ii said:
slowmo said:
Ping_ii said:
slowmo said:
Ping_ii said:
slowmo said:
Ping_ii said:

1.Bu bu but IGN said teh xbawx is teh better grafix!

2.Funny how LOT is no longer "trusted" but back when they did a comparison with the demo showing ps3 version inferior I didn't see 360 fans complain AHAHAHAHAH!

3. 0% screen tearing for ps3 or slight higher frame on 360..........wow xbawx is so superior.


The more hilarious part is the huge number of posts from Sony fans who have dissed them even more when other comparisons of multiplats didn't go their way.  You can't have it both ways.


right do you see them here celebrating? no?

homefront looked slightly better on ps3 did you see a huge fuzz about it from ps3 fans in here?


http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=126253&page=1

Your own thread no less, care to backtrack at all?


what about it? look @ the title its a sarcasm ,due to the past few weeks all the talks about ps3 version being the super inferior so I created that to show other wise.

You made a claim, you were wrong.  Acknowledge that fact or get over it and move on, it really is your choice.

and what claim is that? my claim about ps3 peeps not going crazy over slight difference? I was right look @ the posts most are saying tie those with uncharted on their sign too.

I just re read throught my thread and saw only two were mouthing off about crysis 2 looking better on ps3 with one of them having a mario avatar the other was a new member.

Thats still 2 more than you pretend there is, I'll not bother trawling other threads to prove you wrong, we both know those posters exist. 

My point still stands that there are plenty of posters on here doing the same flip flopping that fly the Sony flag as there are who support Microsoft, more in fact given the huge bias of PS3 fans on this site.  Some posters will support whatever sites fit there agenda at any given time and switch that opinion whenever it doesn't suit them. 

This happens within both sets of fans yet you've decided in error to make out it's only the 360 fans doing this.  That's not the case as plenty of Sony fans have bad mouthed LoT over the last 2 years but I bet they suddenly think they're some authority now.  It's hypocrisy and I don't like anyone doing it regardless of their preference.



Around the Network
mantlepiecek said:
SpartenOmega117 said:
damefan said:
SpartenOmega117 said:

so if  a person installs crysis 2 on hard drive for 360 the screen tearing won't be there right? im pretty sure the ps3 version requires a 5 gb install, therefore there is no screen tearing.


I installed it on my 360 and I don't notice any screen tearing.


i guess its confirmed then. i hope DF installed crysis 2 to 360 hard drive so we can get more accurate results

Installing to the HDD doesn't decrease screen tearing. He just didn't notice it and that's possible even when its there since the % is like 1 so its not that major.


Agreed, the harddrive install would only improve texture pop in not screen tear.  The only thing that might affect screen tear is your connection method (HDMI/Component/VGA) and the resolution you output.



welcome to:

===== http://www.clothes6.org  ====

Air jordan(1-24)shoes $30

Handbags(Coach l v f e n d i d&g) $35

Tshirts (Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste) $15

Jean(True Religion,ed hardy,coogi) $30

Sunglasses(Oakey,coach,gucci,A r m a i n i) $15

New era cap $12

Bikini (Ed hardy,polo) $20



====== http://www.clothes6.org ====

====== http://www.clothes6.org ====

====== http://www.clothes6.org ====

====== http://www.clothes6.org ====

http://www.clothes6.org

====== http://www.clothes6.org ====

====== http://www.clothes6.org ====

====== http://www.clothes6.org ====



jhuff394 said:

The screen tearing is so minimal on both consoles I cant believe people even talk about it......

The game looks identical on both..... but forget how it looks.... this game should be known for being fun not for its looks.

I couldn't agree more but in this HD console war looks will always play some part. In cases like this I just choose the version for the controller I am happier with - depending on the type of game, of course.

If it was move compatible then it would have been PS3, but ...it's not.



slowmo said:
mantlepiecek said:
SpartenOmega117 said:
damefan said:
SpartenOmega117 said:

so if  a person installs crysis 2 on hard drive for 360 the screen tearing won't be there right? im pretty sure the ps3 version requires a 5 gb install, therefore there is no screen tearing.


I installed it on my 360 and I don't notice any screen tearing.


i guess its confirmed then. i hope DF installed crysis 2 to 360 hard drive so we can get more accurate results

Installing to the HDD doesn't decrease screen tearing. He just didn't notice it and that's possible even when its there since the % is like 1 so its not that major.


Agreed, the harddrive install would only improve texture pop in not screen tear.  The only thing that might affect screen tear is your connection method (HDMI/Component/VGA) and the resolution you output.

I am playing on a 250GB slim hooked up by HDMI and installed on the HDD. Screen tear could be there but I don't notice it but in reality I think unless the screen tear is really bad most people don't notice it because they are playing the game. Its easier to notice screen tearing when you're just watching.



Around the Network
Ping_ii said:

1.Bu bu but IGN said teh xbawx is teh better grafix!

2.Funny how LOT is no longer "trusted" but back when they did a comparison with the demo showing ps3 version inferior I didn't see 360 fans complain AHAHAHAHAH!

3. 0% screen tearing for ps3 or slight higher frame on 360..........wow xbawx is so superior.


I mad but you madder



Installing should reduce loading time and texture pop up but waste time with the likes of Halo 3 and Dead Risisng since those were designed to run off the disc directly.



I hated screen or frame tearing when I disable Vsync on certain PC games..the frame rate's not going to bother me 1 bit unless it dips below 20.



Nsanity said:
Ping_ii said:

1.Bu bu but IGN said teh xbawx is teh better grafix!

2.Funny how LOT is no longer "trusted" but back when they did a comparison with the demo showing ps3 version inferior I didn't see 360 fans complain AHAHAHAHAH!

3. 0% screen tearing for ps3 or slight higher frame on 360..........wow xbawx is so superior.


I mad but you madder


right 0 screen tear what about the xbox? ohhh thats right it has.....