@BBsin I don't want to contribute to the cause, but I think it's been reported NUMEROUS times that GT uses a different TV/Brightness setting/contrast/etc etc. on Sony related products. I'm not sure why and it's not just this game, the same was reported about Assassins creed, it looked INSANELY dark on the PS3 version in their comparison, according to many it was actually lighter on the PS3.

The DS vrs. PSP video Leo posted not too long ago showed all the PSP games and I'll tell you, they looked HORRIBLE, far worse than the DS's graphics's wise which I think most of us know just isn't that way...

It woulden't surprise me if GT was using a different TV or setting for the comparison, there's been quite a few suggestions that they do. 

Capcom has been showing primarily the PS3 version for a few months now. Why would they show reviewers/press the worse version? Either they both the same or the PS3 is a little better otherwise does not make sense to me.

Now regarding GameTrailers comparisons, they suck. Since I saw their Assassin's Creed comparison I don't trust them. I do own AC and I do know how it looks and it doesn't look like what they showed at all. I really do not care what they do to make it look worse but they must do something since anyone that owns a PS3 and AC can tell you that the images on that video look wrong.

I think they both look identical.

I think most multi plats will look identical from here on in.

 We've just reached the level of grphical power now where you would need to be superhuman to pick up and notice the minute differences between the two HD consoles.

Still well done Capcom. Game is looking great.

Now can we just have an easy setting in the game for those of us with lives to lead.... 

 Well I woulden't say to see the difference between consoles, just multi-plats. I mean GT5 is supposed to be running 60fps, 1080p... which is a technical marvel for consoles lol. Uncharted is still the best LOOKING video game I've ever played on a console. So I think exclusives on the PS3 still have way more potential graphically than the 360, but I am glad to see that going from the PS3 to the 360 is yielding much better results than going 360 to PS3, it only makes sense that it works that way though lol.

Are you ppl blind? the 360 version is sharper and more detailed.

@Weezy: The extra detail in the 360 version in my opinion (which may be wrong) is mainly because they tended to give the 360 version what i would deem the 'better' position when doing the split screen comparison. It was the closer one where minutae would stand out more. When there was a more even comparison, there was little difference (if any). Even in the few screens where the 360 version seemed to have a slight edge, i think the range of difference is well within the range of potential h.264 artifacts (which it looked like they were using from the file name).

If anyone could tell a difference in the scenes that *WERE NOT* split screen, I will give you a cookie. I am sure I didn't see any, and to me they looked basically identical.

They look very similar to me, but the PS3 version seems to have a tad more motion blur. (?)

yeah or you just busted sony giving precaclculated video's during a show.... I'd give any day more credit to gametrailer that has absolutely no interest into advantaging a console over the other.... than sony's marketing methods and suposedly real time videos like they have done since PS1... we all no they have been saying on previous generation it was real time when later we actually could see with our own eyes they were BSing all the way... and to be honnest I think MS and nintendo are a little more honnest on that... even though being in the marketing and addvertising busyness I wouldn't really trust any videos shown in a show what so ever...

I hope this game bombs. Screw Crapcom. This game would be better had they devoted all of there resources to one platform.