Zkuq said:
Actually owning the product you bought? |
And why/how would you no longer own a product you bought?
Zkuq said:
Actually owning the product you bought? |
And why/how would you no longer own a product you bought?
In geddesmond2's defense Geohot's leaking of the masterkey probably led to all the rapes and subsequently the hunger in Africa.
Sig thanks to Saber! :D
dsister said: In geddesmond2's defense Geohot's leaking of the masterkey probably led to all the rapes and subsequently the hunger in Africa. |
The world is going to hell in a handbasket, and it's all Geohot's fault!!!! LOL
MrBubbles said:
everyone in africa is the product of rape? youre a racist.
and if those countries stopped buying up weapons they could buy their own food. another reason they shouldnt be given any aid. |
You really need to go do some research before you post.
Nomad Blue said: And why/how would you no longer own a product you bought? |
Obviously if someone else can tell what you may or may not do with the product you bought, you don't actually own it.
fordy said:
|
Yes they are, by putting the tools on the internet, you are knowingly enabling EVERYBODY (including pirates) to use those tools for whatever purpose they may have. They knew that there were people waiting to use those tools for illegal purposes, but they did it anyway.
The way I see it, those Keys or whatever is delicate information that shouldn't be distributed to EVERYONE.
geddesmond2 said:
I hope your reincarnated into one of those children in your next life whos only crime was being born in a war stricken Country. |
Maybe thats why most don't send money. Its not going to help that kid who can't eat, its going to be taken by the army and used to further empower them to hurt the poeple they should care for. In fact sending money there probably makes the problem worse as it goes to all the wrong people. Throwing money at a problem usually does not fix it, it just wastes money. Put some thought into things and stop assuming people are heartless. Sometime money isn't the answer to the worlds problem.
Jay520 said:
Yes they are, by putting the tools on the internet, you are knowingly enabling EVERYBODY (including pirates) to use those tools for whatever purpose they may have. They knew that there were people waiting to use those tools for illegal purposes, but they did it anyway. The way I see it, those Keys or whatever is delicate information that shouldn't be distributed to EVERYONE. |
Emulators are ruled perfectly legal, yet they can be USED legally or illegally. There has not been one company that has successfully sued the creators of an emulator, and this will have just about as much chance in a court of law as a lawsuit against an emulator creator. They are both tools, they can both promote piracy, they both inhibit a "the way you use it is your responsibility" clause.
For the 100th time, that sensitive information that you're talking about? That is an INTEGER, a binary number. Binary numbers cannot be copyrighted. They cannot be protected under law from being used. If anything, they key is a tool, which like emulators, could be used for good or bad purposes. And before you say it, no, the difference is that Sony owns the number, because they don't. If anything, emulators would be more illegal because they could impose upon certain microchip architectures, yet they are still legal. This reasoning wouldn't stand a chance in hell.
fordy said:
Emulators are ruled perfectly legal, yet they can be USED legally or illegally. There has not been one company that has successfully sued the creators of an emulator, and this will have just about as much chance in a court of law as a lawsuit against an emulation creator. They are both tools, they can both promote piracy, they both inhibit a "the way you use it is your responsibility" clause. For the 100th time, that sensitive information that you're talking about? That is an INTEGER, a binary number. Binary numbers cannot be copyrighted. They cannot be protected under law from being used. If anything, they key is a tool, which like emulators, could be used for good or bad purposes. And before you say it, no, the difference is that Sony owns the number, because they don't. If anything, emulators would be more illegal because they impose upon certain microchip architectures, yet they are still legal. |
Interesting, I geuss I'll have to take matters into my own hands then
.
Zkuq said:
Obviously if someone else can tell what you may or may not do with the product you bought, you don't actually own it. |
It's everywhere in life get use to it, if you buy your house and the land its on, you own it right? you want to build an extension on your land because its yours and you can do what you want with it right? Wrong! you first have to get permision off the council, and if they say no to your idea of an extension you can't build it, ignoring them and doing so and you'd be breaking the law
You buy a lorry, its resticted to 60mph you want it to go faster, so you derestrict it.... i mean its your property you can do what you want with it! Wrong again , law stands in the way
I bought a dog.........stammped on its head til it died, I bought it i can do with it what i want can't i?
You cannot just do whatever you want to something you own if there are laws saying otherwise,
and if you do go and do it, Don't fricken cry about it when you get taken to court or arrested over it
ffs sake people grow up