same here but is it possible it can be fixed with an update?

Eurogamer, gamespot and ign, videogamer...

Its not that bad, just compared to killzone 2, they are. Seems like weak story is the problem here.

"Along with its fun multiplayer, Killzone 3 is so enjoyable because it’s not just a shooter, it’s an experience. Guerilla has crafted scene after gorgeous scene that made me feel like you’re a part of a brutal, human war that is somehow fantastic in setting but also eerily reminiscent of the wars we see on TV. Combine this with the superb pacing and you have a campaign that’s totally fun despite its boring characters and uninspired story. This may not be the best game on the PS3, but it’s a fantastic option for shooter fans, and the type of title that non-PS3 owners are sure to envy."-ign

so yes the story in the biggest problem with this game but the campaign is still fun to play

What the fuck... I was almost sure that it'd get over 91 meta -_-"

little disapointing? you mean reviews? from what ive seen the game isnt disapointing. only grudges ign and gamespot had is that t has a terrible campaign but other reviews said it has a great one. so it aint doing that bad.

what shocks me is that destructoid gave it a 10.

right now its 88 on meta

heres a review with no score, also its long :).

I'm not saying review scores hold any significance, they don't. If anything the scores despite the near consensus that this is a better game than KZ2 show how meaningless they really are. 

oh these are coming in already...

and I was right to think reviews will be a lot harsher when it comes to scoring the game..oh well it still looks to be miles better than kz2

i just read the destructoid review and - "For the first time in the series, Killzone 3 brings both online and split-screen co-op to the table."

so deos it have it or not?