Cactus said:
I don't mean to sound negaitve, but learning that Infamous has an 85% on Metacritic honestly surprised me. I played it to completion a couple of months after it was released and I wouldn't have gone above 7/10. Graphical glitches, framerate drops, repetitive missions, mediocre story, terrible ending, laughable "choice" system, etc. Ok, well, a bunch of those things are subjective, but my point is that while I'm sure the sequel will be better in every regard, I'm not sure if it will ever come close to a Zelda game, which are always polished to perfection and rarely have universally maligned issues. Just my opinion.
|
Glitches - Yeah, but for an open world game that came out 2 years ago i thought it did a pretty good job rendering all the people and animation. So it was worth the glitches that didn't even effect the game at all.
Repetitive missions - Yeah, but you didn't have to do the repetitive ones at all. And the good/evil missions more than made up for it imo.
Ending - You are out of your mind to think the ending was bad.
Choice system - There is a lack of choice systems this gen, and while i agree with you that the system in infamous is weaker then that of the Mass Effect games, at least it had one that effects your powers.
The zelda games might me polished. But it is easy to keep a clean shoe polished if you catch my drift.