Buying costume/texture that are already on disk... Gamers have fallen really low. Sheep is a better word. This is sheepcore

Buying costume/texture that are already on disk... Gamers have fallen really low. Sheep is a better word. This is sheepcore

I still call BS on that as a reason. Battlefield Bad Company 2 for instance onlya couple weeks ago released a 1.7GB mandatory patch most of which was for the VIetnam exansion (when you buy Vietnam it is just a tiny unock file).  Vietnam is £10, to buy all SSFIV costumes would be I think £22.40, or about £15 as a bundle when that releases in April or so.  The SSFIV costume are only about 350MB in total, so the costs for releasing them are not only a lot less than BF but the money to be made would be significantly more also.  BF runs dedicated servers to.

Capcom just cheaping out and using Sony as a excuse.

No one will buy them if cannot let others see them, evidently most people agree with this since the previous two sets of costume you'd see people using often but I haven't bought any of these and never get the messae that someone using a costume I do not have.

Eh, Nintendo does DLC on retail games too.  Even paid DLC like in Tales of Graces (costume packs just like... well, SSF4).  Remember that whole "research" thing? ;)

Sony's scamming pubs, charging them for services that are free on competitor's platform.  All there is to it, but at least direct your bitching properly.

Since you seem to have some trouble anylysing facts on basic logic level I'll do this for you.

The whole problem exists because that DLC isn't on disk.

How come Capcom is incredibly tight/cheap and not Sony? it's hard to remember which companies we are supposed to hate on the forums...

This is VGC and Sony can do no wrong. I mean seriously when you have people defending Sony for removing features from their PS3's after the fact, you know that Sony will never get the blame around here.