Capcom should put Resident Evil: Outbreak 1 2 into one game and release it as part of their Archives series. Now THAT I would buy for full price! XO
Capcom should put Resident Evil: Outbreak 1 2 into one game and release it as part of their Archives series. Now THAT I would buy for full price! XO
Pavolink said: Wii doesn't need PS2 ports. Wii need new games like The Last Story, Xenoblade, Little King Story, Muramasa, No More Heroes, Red Steel, The Conduit, The Grinder, Disaster Day of Crisis. But also need games with quality over quantity. :/ |
I didn't claim the Wii needed them. More that showing that those kinds of games can sell on the Wii needs those games, as they are plentiful and established hits.
A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.
Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs
LordTheNightKnight said:
|
Sorry, misunderstood. :P
Agree. Wii need new chapters from established franchises.
Proud to be the first cool Nintendo fan ever
Number ONE Zelda fan in the Universe
Prediction: No Zelda HD for Wii U, quietly moved to the succesor
Predictions for Nintendo NX and Mobile
Many kinds of games that were on PS2 could sell on Wii. However many developers decided either to look away or to port the wrong games
the_bloodwalker said: Many kinds of games that were on PS2 could sell on Wii. However many developers decided either to look away or to port the wrong games |
Which is frankly a crime against gaming, to treat 75 million Wii owning households like they don't deserve those classics from last generation.
A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.
Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs
LordTheNightKnight said: Which is frankly a crime against gaming, to treat 75 million Wii owning households like they don't deserve those classics from last generation. |
What was really needed was just one company to put the right games on Wii (not just one), the others would follow
the_bloodwalker said:
What was really needed was just one company to put the right games on Wii (not just one), the others would follow |
It's not too late. They can still connect with the Wii audience. If they don't, then thinking they can succeed on the next system is a fool's hope. The audience is not stupid enough to just accept companies that basically spat on them, and then are suddenly embracing them just because they bought the "right" system now.
A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.
Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs
It's already too late for most companies... while others still have a chance
the_bloodwalker said: It's already too late for most companies... while others still have a chance |
All third parties have a chance. The Wii isn't getting a successor right now, no matter how much they want.
A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.
Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs
LordTheNightKnight said:
|
Sometimes filing your potential customers is more than enough to lose your chance. you can name many companies that shafted the average Wii customer. That's why I it's too late for them.
However there are other companies that can release their games now and have a gootd sales because they havent' played with the customer