Ok, so Smash Bros does play like that game. But there are still no shooter like Metroid Prime. and there are no Adventure game like the 3D Zeldas.

With most of the Sony first party games I mentioned, there is always a third party game that did almost identical gameplay first. But with Nintnedo's games, usually the only game that has similar gameplay is an earlier Nintendo game in the same series. That was my point and it still stands.

yeah, I can see where this one is going......

my suggestion is you actually play the games before you bash them, and judging by your post you haven't played ANY of them, especially killzone 2

I guess we would have to agree to disagree on the atmosphere setting it apart from other shoooters, but another thing that it got credited for was its unique hard-sci fi art direction.

And I just realized about Black: It was released after Killzone, and I was asking for a game that released before it. So I could explain my thoughts as to why I don't feel they're similar, but there's no point.

To be honest, at this point, we're just beating a dead horse.

Sony, mostly because they aren't really bringing anything to the table anymore. Imitation != Innovation. Anyone who fails to contribute to the game industry's evolution is just hampering it.

MS brought us Live, a great online service for remote multiplayer gaming, along with HD graphics. Plus they are changing the way motion controls work, sans controler.

Nintendo brought us modern motion control gaming, opening a wide spectrum of gaming possibilities (which yes, also include casual titles and Imagine Babiez lol)

Sony just said "Lets take HD graphics, and we'll also take that notion of motion control Nintendo came up with, and work around the patent"

Sony has contributed the least in the past 5 years to the industry, so if one had to go, it'd be the dead weight.

Orly? how can you see that I haven't played them? What insight am I supposed to have that you so clearly can see that I don't have?

I only need to see gameplay to see that GoW plays exactly like DMC, and that GT is a racing game. Do you think, after having seen a walkthrough of Ratchet & Clank and stating that it's a basic 3D platformer that that assumption is wrong? Would me playing it suddenly make me realize that it's a survival horror?

My point still stand as strong as ever despite your accusations.

BLACK was released after? Ok, my bad. 

Killzone is still a generic FPS though, I really don't see how you think its atmosphere (which I consider to be pretty standard for FPS games) somehow makes it an original game concept.

ok dude GOW3 plays nothing like DMC, they're both hack n slash and thats clearly  ALL you know

GT is a simulator, the first on a console, not a racing game -_-

and yes ratchet is a 3d platform, but before call it generic PLAY the damn game dude

typical Nintendo fan every genre Nintendo isn't in is generic and every genre they are in should be exclusive to just them and everything is a knock off, pathetic you guys seriously, and this while having never played the games yourselves......

but whatever dude, you keep playing and loving the same f**king game over and over and I'll sit and suffer threw the endlessly diverse, quality line up, that spans all genres and preferences, and have been doing so from the start.

I realize now my being here was wrong as I'm clearly not a mo- Nintendo fan, I'm leaving now

sony, just because i still resent them for the dark N64/cube days.

I wake up every morning trying to explode Sony with my mind.

GT is a realistic-style racing game.

Ratchet & Clank is a standard 3D platformer with guns.

And you are BLIND if you think GoW plays differently from DMC. I have seen my friend play both on his PS2, and the ONLY difference between them is that GoW had QTE's.

Go play your games that copies whatever gameplay is popular at the time and keep telling yourself that those games are SO original.

LOL at the spans all genres and preferences part BTW, all genres, yea right.