By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Medal of Honor vs. RDR?

 

Medal of Honor vs. RDR?

Red Dead Redemption 29 61.70%
 
Medal of Honor 18 38.30%
 
Total:47

I cannot decide which to get. Red Dead Redemption looks great while MoH looks to be very interesting(its premise at least) Also, will MoH have a variety of Kill streaks and perks? If you are getting MoH or have RDR and have a ps3, friend me. my psn is: power_hungryfool



"Everything we hear is an opinion, not a fact. Everything we see is a perspective, not the truth." -My good friend Mark Aurelius

Around the Network

Well I always ask the people who ask these questions this:

What type of gameplay interests you more?

Red Dead Redemption is an excellent Third Person Shooter Open World Game is great Story Telling elements along with great music and voiceacting, superb gameplay, tons of side quests and challenges, etc and it packs so much value and that's only the Single Player Part I'm talking about. Multiplayer is an absolute blast but you need friends to play because there's no matchmaking in RDR.

Medal of Honor on the other hand is a FPS Game set in a Modern Timeframe. I can't give you much insight as to how great Medal of Honor is but from what I've been hearing, the Single Player Part of MOH is very good. What you can do is I think there's a MOH Multiplayer Demo releasing this week on the PSN and you can DL that and see whether you like the Multiplayer of MOH. The purpose of this demo is to show the players what's been improved since the Beta.

Yes MOH will have Killstreaks but don't think it has perks. Not too sure on that but think of MOH's Multiplayer as MW2 meets Bad Company 2.



I played the MOH beta and the game is terrible. Save some money, pick up RDR,  and then pick up Black OPs.



I already beat RDR and traded it in,great game. I'm also getting MOH. I'd get both,but if I had to pick one,I'd get RDR



Red Dead Redemption. But I must say, I don't know anything about the new Medal of Honor game except for that Linkin Park made a song for it. But I'd definitely go the RDR route. Get more value out of it.



Around the Network

I say neither. I own RDR for xbox 360 and i played MOH beta for PS3. It seemed as if MOH was trying to be a combination of bad company 2 and cod. The result was terrible and something i got bored of fast. That combination did not work well together. RDR was not very memorable.  Even over xbox live my friends and i still talk about GTA 4 but RDR is long forgotten. The reason is because RDR multiplayer got boring fast. I imagined the multiplayer would have cool horse races/chases. In multiplayer horses are nowhere to be seen and is basicalle team deathmatch over and over again. The single player was also long forgotten. Don't get me wrong it was good while it lasted but it was basically GTA 4 with a western setting. In the end i also prefer GTA 4 single player because it felt more alive and it was also more memorable imo. To this day on these forums we still talk about uncharted 2 and demons souls but not RDR. And even my friends on xbox live go back and play GTA 4 cops and crooks but we never even talk about RDR or even try to start a conversation about it.

Both of these games deserve a rent. I think it would be a better idea just to wait for COD black ops or just buy bad company 2 ultimate edition because both were a better experience than MOH imo. As for RDR i think you should just rent it. Im not going to lie, RDR will likely win some game of the year awards but so did GTA 4 and according to most people on these forums GTA 4 did not deserve any game of the year awards. If you do want an open world game though, i recommend waiting for fallout new vegas or fable 3.



Haven't played MOH yet (obviously) but RDR is a gem, it's really really good. I dislike GTAs story but liked the open world, driving, mission structure, etc. RDR's story is much much better than any GTA (imo).

 

I'd suggest to wait for a few reviews to MOH to pop up, read them and then make your purchase based on what you read or see.

If you had to ask me, Red Dead all the way.



I can't say whether or not MoH sucks since I didn't play the beta but it looks alot like Battlefield Bad Company 2. Wait and see what the critical reception is for MoH before making your decision. But if I would have to pick one, I would definetely go for Red Dead Redemption.



Who's the best Pac, Nas, and Big. Just leave it to that.

PLAYSTATION®3 is the future.....NOW.......B_E_L_I_E_V_E

Slaughterhouse Is The Sh*t  .... NOW ........ B_E_L_I_E_V_E

Well there both different types of games, do you like open world games more or fps? I have red dead and thought it was great, the single player anyway. didn't really like the multiplayer that much. I can't really say anything for moh since I haven't played it yet though but judging from the previews, it looks like a game similiar to bfbc and mw2, some hybrid of the two.



MOH beta was Beta and it had its problems like all betas, but the ioned out the flaws, its a game thats NO cod style, its has a gameplay feel that much hardcore than COD4 but still retains a cod4 feel in a BFBC2 setting. it requires skill to play online. 

But single player is a total new ball game, GOTY potential , made by EA LA now Danger Close where as on line was DICE (which is a great move as it made the SP much better) 

MOH is new, so i suggest getting that, but dont get me wrong RDR is great but if you wait a bit you can get it for very cheap aka platinum/greatest hits edition etc



Of Course That's Just My Opinion, I Could Be Wrong