in a way that makes a lot of sense to me when I actually think about it, I just never did, in a way you are right and we could have adapted to our environment to put it in simple terms, I mean just look at people who ,live in hotter areas of the earth they are more resilient to the heat but feel the cold more, and people who went to live at higher altitude's have stated it took them a while to adapt and they thought it would be impossible to have children in new situations, but it eventually happened and apparently the children were acclimatised, just some info I found out on the internet

does this make sense to you, did I understand right??

Well, yes you are mostly right, but one thing I would add.

You are right in saying that life will adapt to the nature that allows it. But I also believe that life has the potential to be extremely diverse, and from this diverse potential types of life, only one (or maybe more?) can exist in a universe that allows it. We, for example, may be able to adapt to a slightly different universe, but could never adapt to a universe with small amounts of Carbon or no gravity. But that is not to say a Universe with no Carbon or gravity couldn't support another type of life.

Yet life that is different from us could potentially thrive in universes like that.

To extend your analogy. It's kind of like saying this human can adapt to live on a mountain, but they can't adapt to live on the moon of Europa. However, Europa may accommodate another type of life that is different to us. You just extend this idea to the laws of nature too.

@highwaystar101

Yes, you understand right, I'm a Young Earth Bible Believing Authorized King James Using Self Professed Christian.

Geological column - stratigraphic layers, radiometric dating, carbon dating, and all the like have been address and explained numerous times by creation scientists many times before.

Of their ilk Kent Hovind is the creationist with whom I agree most with, I've also studied his work more so than other creationists.  If you'd like to understand these points better, and at the same time gaining both sides of the argument I'd recommend watching some debates (may'be search for some with your favorite scientists.)

So you believe in Kent Hovind? The same guy thats in jail right now? The guy that has recieved all his degrees from non-accredited universities that are known as being "diploma mills".

You do realize that the man has had no scientific education what so ever right?

Hovind is one of the biggest conspiracy nuts out there. I mean the things he believes in are down right insane. He thinks that laetrile, a cyanid releasing component, is a cancer cure that is being held from the public by the US government, and that is one of his more reasonable conspiracy theories.

Read this theory written by a man with no scientific background

Hovind summarizes his version of the young Earth creation story into the eponymous "Hovind Theory" taken from a variety of creationist sources.[40][41] The "Hovind Theory" was presented at Hovind lectures and in his work "Unmasking the False Religion of Evolution".[41] Hovind explained the Biblical account of Noah as follows: Noah's family and two of every "kind" of animal (including young dinosaurs)[42] safely boarded the Ark before a −300 °F (−184 °C) ice meteor came flying toward the earth and broke up in space. Some of the meteor fragments became rings and others caused the impact craters on the moon and some of the planets. The remaining ice fragments fell to the North and South poles of the Earth, concentrated towards those regions by the Earth's magnetic field.

He explains the fossils were created by billions of organisms that were washed together by the mass destruction of the worldwide flood, completely buried, and rapidly fossilized.[43]

The resulting "super-cold snow" fell near the poles, burying the mammoths standing up.[41] Ice on the North and South pole cracked the crust of the earth releasing the fountains of the deep, which in turn caused certain ice age effects, namely the glacier effects. This made the earth "wobble around" and collapsed the vapor canopy that protected it.

During the first few months of the flood, the dead animals and plants were buried, and became oil and coal, respectively. The last few months of the flood included geological instability, when the plates shifted. This period saw the formation of both ocean basins and mountain ranges and the resulting water run-off caused incredible erosion – Hovind states that the Grand Canyon was formed in a couple of weeks during this time.[44] After a few hundred years, the ice caps slowly melted back retreating to their current size and the ocean levels increased, creating the continental shelves. The deeper oceans absorbed much of the carbon dioxide in earth’s atmosphere and thus allowed greater amounts of radiation to reach the earth's surface. As a result, human lifespans were shortened considerably in the days of Peleg.

yeah that makes much sense thanks for the insight, i owe you for enlightenment

So you believe in Kent Hovind? The same guy thats in jail right now? The guy that has recieved all his degrees from non-accredited universities that are known as being "diploma mills".

You do realize that the man has had no scientific education what so ever right?

Hovind is one of the biggest conspiracy nuts out there. I mean the things he believes in are down right insane. He thinks that laetrile, a cyanid releasing component, is a cancer cure that is being held from the public by the US government, and that is one of his more reasonable conspiracy theories.

Read this theory written by a man with no scientific background

Hovind summarizes his version of the young Earth creation story into the eponymous "Hovind Theory" taken from a variety of creationist sources.[40][41] The "Hovind Theory" was presented at Hovind lectures and in his work "Unmasking the False Religion of Evolution".[41] Hovind explained the Biblical account of Noah as follows: Noah's family and two of every "kind" of animal (including young dinosaurs)[42] safely boarded the Ark before a −300 °F (−184 °C) ice meteor came flying toward the earth and broke up in space. Some of the meteor fragments became rings and others caused the impact craters on the moon and some of the planets. The remaining ice fragments fell to the North and South poles of the Earth, concentrated towards those regions by the Earth's magnetic field.

He explains the fossils were created by billions of organisms that were washed together by the mass destruction of the worldwide flood, completely buried, and rapidly fossilized.[43]

The resulting "super-cold snow" fell near the poles, burying the mammoths standing up.[41] Ice on the North and South pole cracked the crust of the earth releasing the fountains of the deep, which in turn caused certain ice age effects, namely the glacier effects. This made the earth "wobble around" and collapsed the vapor canopy that protected it.

During the first few months of the flood, the dead animals and plants were buried, and became oil and coal, respectively. The last few months of the flood included geological instability, when the plates shifted. This period saw the formation of both ocean basins and mountain ranges and the resulting water run-off caused incredible erosion – Hovind states that the Grand Canyon was formed in a couple of weeks during this time.[44] After a few hundred years, the ice caps slowly melted back retreating to their current size and the ocean levels increased, creating the continental shelves. The deeper oceans absorbed much of the carbon dioxide in earth’s atmosphere and thus allowed greater amounts of radiation to reach the earth's surface. As a result, human lifespans were shortened considerably in the days of Peleg.

You have to be completely blind to believe the things that man says. I believe in God. I also believe God gave me a brain to use, not to follow ignorant people like sheep.

That's the lamest argument ever. If we're going with assumptions (as the ideea that the deity you worship exists and the necessity for it to exist are mere assumptions), there's absolutely no reason why one couldn't assume that the deity you worship (God), wasn't created by another being. Also what's outside time and space?

Thank you.

It was really frustrating me that his whole argument was essentially "I'm right because I'm right". Especially when he claimed that I didn't understand his argument.