I was merely countering his point that they would not look like copies, which is false. They will inevitably look like copies, which i will grant isn't *fair*, but is certainly the case. Much like Move itself against the Wii remote. Sony's trying to put forth a legitimate effort to one-up Nintendo's motion control efforts by providing similar hardware and software, but technologically superior in both cases. The problem is that this is inevitably going to clash with the well-established Nintendo products

I'm not saying Sony should come up with new sports, but I am saying that it's going to look like a copy to the consumer, and that it will naturally be hard for them to differentiate the experience enough.

Well I think Sports Champions is obviously because Wii Sports showed how well the idea works as a demo for motion controls and completely agree with anyone who thinks they copied the general concept, but poo pooing on Sony for using a lot of the same sports Nintendo has is just being unreasonable.  There aren't that many fun and easily recognizeable sports to put into a motion controlled game that Nintendo hasn't already done.  And I don't want a sports game filled with Badmitton, Water Polo, and Bossaball.

Well I agree with you there, it will inevitably look like a straight copy to most consumers. 

Consider the source.

Peter Molyneaux has a reputation for over-hyping and under-delivering.

Not that the games and products he works on are not good. They are just not as good as he makes them out to be -- because nothing can be that good.

Mike from Morgantown

I think the problem is really caused when users say Sony motion pursuit wasn't a result of Nintendo successful pursuit into motion controls. I do feel that Kinect is very similar to eyetoy, but the execution of the product is different.

Edit forgot my point: While I feel the execution of the move makes it very similar to the Wii. (At this time)

As for the topic at hand, no I do not believe it is a much bigger step than the wii. 

Sony started working on motion contorller in 2001, go look up on youtube and stop trolling

Peter Molyneux always mouths off about how great things WILL be in his new ventures. However many of things he boasts about don't ever come into fruition - tress growing in real time in Fable anyone??? The guy loves to come out with grandstanding statements.

Whilst I respect that Microsoft has tried to do something different with Kinect (rather than just copying the Wii like Move), I do still think games need some form of controller input and where as I see the way the Wii remote or Move can be implemented into regular games, I'm yet to see how anyone could play Halo, Fifa, COD, Forza, SFIV etc with Kinect.

Kinect is going to be interesting, but let's face facts - Kinect and Move are only happening because of what the Wii has done, that alone negates his point.

In fact not only Sports Champions and Ps Move look like the imitations, but they really are the imitations.

And before you tell me to go to play with move, I already did at Gamescom 2010, kthxbai.

"kthxbai"? Really?

I wouldn't go with the word 'imitation' to describe Sports Champions...I would call it Improvement...But of course, this is personal opinion...I would even go so far as to say that I have Never played a Wii game that had Motion Controls as it's primary form of control that worked well...In My Opinion

Edit: If You can give me one game that works as well as, and you can get a similar experience to "Start The Party" (Which works really well as long as your camera is where it says you should put it) on Wii...Then we'll talk more on the subject, otherwise, you can keep calling it a copy or an "imitation" without good grounds

Didn't Molyneux refer to Fable as the 'Zelda killer'?