Mr Puggsly said:
kowhoho said:
Mr Puggsly said:
You're a horrible liar.
You even said this, "This would be an example of someone who doesn't look like they're having much fun at all. He flicks his wrist at the screen the whole time."
You clearly posted that video specifically because the game looks boring. You could of found a game that made better use of Kinect's technology or was more interactive, but no. You for some reason had to post that specifically.
|
I haven't ever found a game that does use it well. For this reason I came to you but you had to blow everything out of proportion.
|
Well I have definitely seen games that make better use of the technology than that pile of crap. So have you, which is why you specifically chose it.
This wouldn't have gotten blown out of proportion if your obvious bias against the Kinect didn't come out.
|
All of the games I've seen for it suck (imo) as far as a technological and "fun" level go.
Bias implies prejudice and I am not prejudiced against anything here. I really haven't seen anything good for it. If you have seen something that people like me would actually want to spend time and money on, I'm open to education.
I watched the Forza demo which honestly felt like half a game because you can't even accelerate.What's the point.
I saw that Harry Potter hogwash.
I stomached the video for Kinect Adventures, which had people move uncomfortably to dodge obstacles while standing still on a platform.
I've seen actual gameplay for the sports compilation, where football is just a choice of kicking left, right or forward and the race is all about running in place like a baffoon and jumping 10 feet before the hurdle because the camera needs a second to pick it up.
I've seen plenty and none of it has been anything more than mediocre.