Kyros said: "Why not use the pointer as a replacement for the camera angles?"
You can do many things. But I had a longer playing session with Zelda and in the end the standard controller has all controls (and more) and it is much more relaxed. You have everything in your hand I think its more precise and you can lay back in the couch.
Personally I would say for games with swinging motions (tennis) the Wii controller wins hands down For FPS I think the results are split, pointing and shooting with Wii motion controls is fun but I am not sure about the duck-hunt atmosphere. (Keyboard+Mouse win hands down of course) For Action Adventures the standard controller has a distinct edge Fighting/Arcade games are unplayable with motion controls.
But these are my personal preferences.
|
I'll give you your prefrence no problem, I was just pointing out if it's done properly it can be virtually the same. I laid down while playing zelda >.> Metroid it was a bit harder because of the need to aim lol.
As far as mouse and keyboard vs pointer, I prefer the wii remote though the added buttons of a keyboard as definatly useful. Maybe one day we can have Wii-mote + keyboard.
For action games it can go either way they both work fine when implimented properly, unfortunatly developers had largely neglected the Wii and still are cautious that it might be a fad which could destroy a good thing. A self fufilling prophecy of sorts.
For arcade games I dunno I think it could be done well either way they just need to figure it out. The Naruto games do an ok job at it but it could be a lot better.