Farmageddon said:
Kasz216 said:
Farmageddon said:
I don't think that would make much sense. I mean, if 71% of people are Christians, and assuming they are randomly spread and the desire to get into each school is randomly spread, 71% of applications would be from Christians and 29% from outside. Your reasoning means it would be MUCH easier for a non-christian to get in there. Which makes little sense, seeing as they have a right to reserve for christians. Besides, if 49% of people there were non-christians, I think the guy who studies there would know and wouldn't imply it works differently from the way you're supposing it does, don't you think?
Also, on Universities with "quotas", saying x% is reserved for y group means what I said earlier, so I think it's just natural for them to use the same terminology
|
Except... your ignoring the fact that there very well may be quotas for other religions too.
Also, that you have no actual proof of said quotas.
|
I'm not sure I get what you mean by the bolded part, but I never said I had actual proof for anything anyway. And you don't have either :P
I was just talking about quotas to illustrate how it works in other circunstances.
And even if they actually had a "non-christian quota", 49% would be just ridiculous on a 29% non-christian place. Moreover, when you have quotas, you have a reserved percentage only a given group can apply to, but said group also runs for the "universal" part of the applications, so they can actually go over their "49%" but never (unless there's simply not enough of them, which is hard when there's any considerable competition) less than those "49%".
But a non-christian quota makes little sense unless non-christians there actually have much lower living standards for some reason.
Anwyay, I really think he'd know if half his classmates were not christians.
|
It makes as much sense as having a Christian quota... also, chances are they DO have a much lower standard of living. At least that's how it seems to work in other Europeon countries. France for example.
The point is, a 51% quota is largely meaningless, since statistically at least 51% of the school body would be majority Christian anyway...
You don't "pick which spots" you run for or anything... so if the school is atleast 52% Christian, then you know the Quota was meaningless. The only way such a quota would be enforced would be if infact 49% of the school was non christian.
Which like you said... he'd know. So such a quota is meanginless. It'd be like if the US had a quota that 10% of all college students must be white.
10% of all college students are going to be white anyway. It's dumb, but it's also meaningless.