Farmageddon said:
I'm not sure I get what you mean by the bolded part, but I never said I had actual proof for anything anyway. And you don't have either :P I was just talking about quotas to illustrate how it works in other circunstances. And even if they actually had a "non-christian quota", 49% would be just ridiculous on a 29% non-christian place. Moreover, when you have quotas, you have a reserved percentage only a given group can apply to, but said group also runs for the "universal" part of the applications, so they can actually go over their "49%" but never (unless there's simply not enough of them, which is hard when there's any considerable competition) less than those "49%". But a non-christian quota makes little sense unless non-christians there actually have much lower living standards for some reason. Anwyay, I really think he'd know if half his classmates were not christians. |
It makes as much sense as having a Christian quota... also, chances are they DO have a much lower standard of living. At least that's how it seems to work in other Europeon countries. France for example.
The point is, a 51% quota is largely meaningless, since statistically at least 51% of the school body would be majority Christian anyway...
You don't "pick which spots" you run for or anything... so if the school is atleast 52% Christian, then you know the Quota was meaningless. The only way such a quota would be enforced would be if infact 49% of the school was non christian.
Which like you said... he'd know. So such a quota is meanginless. It'd be like if the US had a quota that 10% of all college students must be white.
10% of all college students are going to be white anyway. It's dumb, but it's also meaningless.








