Farmageddon said:
Here we have quotas on universities, pretty much all of them, and that's how it works. Someone who has a right for the quota will be running for that share as well as the universal share. If you hav eno rght to nay quota you only run for the universal share. Which means it's much easier for someone with quotas to get in, even when the percentage is low. At a high percentage and with small competition, it would get even easier. I'm supposing it works the same way as it does in these cases because that actually makes a difference and also fits better with his implication, thus making more sense instead of being completelly useless. I guess the only sure way to know is if he tells us which one it is. |
Er... are you sure how it works... because... if I'm understanding you... that makes no sense.
How it works... at least in the US and every other system i've seen... your quotas are the first spots filled. For example if you had a quota that your school pf 100 needs to be 10% asian... the smartest 10 asians would fill your 10% quota.
From there the rest of the asians are moved into the pool for universal shares.
Its the only way i've ever heard of quotas working... heck it's the only way quotas can work. Otherwise it's not a quota.
Though admittidly England is weird. I mean, i'm pretty sure they have 100% muslim schools.
Really religious diversity in schools have been shown to greatly increase academic output.








