Well I love motion controls and thats the ONLY reason i still play the wii but you got to see that the wii lacks

in graphics and 90% of the games don't have good motion controls.

Sorcery has better graphics than anything on the wii (not the PS3 just wii) and the motions is more 1:1. 

Now i know redsteel2 and Zelda can do this with M but it doesn't look as good as this. Tech wise not art style.

But for me the more motion controlled games the better on any system but not the 360 until they get a controller.

Your guys' impressions on the video seem epic already, lol can't wait to watch all of the videos of E3 once I return to US.(Being forced to use dial-up ATM)

Yeah totally agree. Imagined the color of your light saber matches the color of Move. It will also feels right having to hold something when playing that kind of game.

I believe it is fine to fine fault with motion control..  However, what any set of controls is supposed to do is make immersion more natural and make you feel part of the game.  The controls should be able to communicate what you want in a game, to be able to get it to do what you want.  What motion control promises, when done right, is a game mapping to what you want to do, without the need for more controls being added.  We really can't go much beyond what we have now for the 360 and PS3 controllers, as far as buttons go (ok, maybe add two more to the front).  So, how do we end up capturing play that is like in real life, where we do things we do here?  And how does it feel natural.  Would a dancing game or bowling be better if they were limited to a pad controller? 

IT is when you watch the stage demos in the press conference, Sorcery worked flawlessly, Zelda failed to work properly...and no it wasn't t wireless interferance as the problem with the controls only happened with the first person view when the bow was used.

But that is the risk companies face when trying to do live game demos, I'm just surprised Nintendo didn't have a back up people in case such a thing ever happened, ah well it's all in the past and GAF have had fun making gifs.

It was interference, did you not see the reports from the show floor about the controls working flawlessly? 

Anyway, on topic, I thought Sorcery looked pretty interesting. I thought it was the best thing they showed for Move, I'd rather play LBP2 with the traditional controller. Sorcery gave me a a Fable sorta vibe, and that game was also pretty interesting.

I can see why Sorcery is getting many peoples attention, but for me Socom 4 was the standout for move, i love the idea of using something like the move wand to aim, and properly too, not how the wii has done it up to this point.  I wonder though how much of an unfair advantage it will be online against people with gamepads.

Sorcery was epic, I was on the fence on motion controlls for the PS3 (I have a Wii), but after seeing everything from E3, I'm much more interested in Move.

That's what I think

1. Don't know why people are excited about that. Your guess is as good as mine.

2. It being a pointer with many spells accessible lends better to gameplay than gestures which would take longer to perform than selecting via pointer quickly and throwing

3. Spells like arcane bolt should vary depending on angle and force.  It would be difficult to do that with gesturing.

4. It appeared to worked perfectly the whole time without a hitch as far as I could tell.  

I have always loved the idea of motion controls. I tried many eye toy games and early wii titles.  Implementation blew.  The eyetoy won disdain from me because it wouldn't always register  correctly.  I was really taken out of the first trauma center when I had to defibrillate someone and i failed because it couldn't tell i was moving the remote and nunchuck forward(still love the series though).  Same with MP3 and it's nunchuck grab and throw.  Or how I got hit quite a few times in SMG because I didn't shake the controller "enough".  This demonstration seems to have that kinda stuff out of the way.  

Sorry if my enjoyment of mindful implementation and accurate response seems anti-Nintendo, it most certainly isn't.   It's just the idea of a meatier game than WS/WSR/WF game with responsive motion controls seems cool and not many companies have done that well including Nintendo.  Had Nintendo or any 3rd party offered me Bushido Blade clone instead of sword fighting mini game in WSR I would've have been all over it. Those simply aren't the kinds of motion controlled games that appear on the Wii.  Sorcery simply give me hope that they will on PS3.