The reason that the Gamecube had smaller discs was that Nintendo wanted to decrease the threat of piracy.

I"m not saying that I'm extremely frustrated with Sony. Basically the only thing I'm disappointedd with is that Sony's and Nintendo's controllers look so similar, as in they are shaped exactly the same. I know there's not a whole lot of options, but I still think there are more things Sony could've done to make more of a difference between the controllers. I'm not angry with Sony moving to motion control, I'm angry that the controllers look so similar.

see. ididn't know any of that. this is news to me, but i did know sony worked on motion controles during the life of the PS2.

yea. i thought they would have made two joysticks with both having analog sticks.

Its because they know PS move is a better product, it can do so much more, and its more accurate , and this is several developers talking, its on a HD console, now people will have the best of both worlds. and last Sony will take market share from Nintendo. They all want to talk there smack about copying Nintendo, Thats why PS move itself has been in development for 9 years, before Nintendo released the Wii, I won't even list all the things Nintendo and MS have copied from Sony, that is the game, someone developes a product, there is always someone looking to make it better just like Sony did, Just like all car makers do, Ford, then Chevrolet, Dodge, they all studied each others cars and Ideas and made them better and better. Some people and Fans just can't Deal. Its the way the world turns.

"We've had our ideas copied so often that we've gotten really sensitive about it"

-Satura Iwata

ditto

Ugh, no they didnt.

I played SOCOM 4, Move Party, The Shoot, Brunswick Pro Bowling, EyePet, and Sports Champions using the PlayStation Move at GDC this year.  I have yet to be convinced that it is a better product.  The Move's subchuck attachment doesn't have motion or tilt sensing in it, and the PS3 can't talk to 4 subchucks at once, so if you're playing a 4 player game, everybody can only use one controller instead of two.  The Wii solved those problems in 2006.  And if the Move has far superior tech, the games aren't showing it yet, though hopefully that will change in the future.  Their competition isn't the Wii remote; their competition is the Wii Motion+ and Wii Sports Resort.  Wii Sports Resort has already sold 15.4 million, making it the 20th best-selling game of all time.  For comparison, the best-selling PS3 game (Modern Warfare 2) has sold about half that, at 7.89 million. 

If the Move was actually in development for 9 years, then all the Sony PR quotes about how motion control is a stupid gimmick for senior citizens, and how Sony would never copy something stupid like that, IS THE REASON NINTENDO FANS ARE ANGRY.  That is their hypocricy right there.  They either hated motion controls for years, got owned by Nintendo, and changed their minds, or they were just lying for years while secretly developing the Move.  Either way, from a PR point of view, it looks really bad.  That's what people are mad about.  This is the same reason people were mad at Sony when they said "rumble is last gen technology, motion controls are the future" for their original SIXAXIS controller, when it was obvious that the only reason they didn't use rumble was because Immersion (the owners of the rumble tech) were suing them.  As soon as the lawsuit and its appeals were all over and settled, rumble was back in the new DualShock 3.  Sony PR was caught insulting rumble for no good reason, then they brought rumble back.  THEN, after calling motion the future, they called it a stupid gimmick for senior citizens.  THEN they announced the Move.  I'm sure that each time somebody at Sony insults a specific technology, somebody else at Sony is doing a facepalm because they're working on that exact product.  It just makes the company look bad and unorganized, like nobody at Sony knows what anybody else at Sony is doing.

And regarding the potential success of the Move:

For years we've known that in the future everybody would have motion controls.  Nintendo proved that taking away complex controllers and replacing them with intuitive TV-remote-esque controllers that anybody would already know how to use can expand your userbase tenfold.  But Nintendo's been advertising this for 4 years, and Sony and Microsoft have been talking about it for just about a year, and they don't have their products on the market yet.  They won't be stealing the Wii's thunder anytime soon.  The Wii has too much momentum in the areas of expanded audience and innovative/intuitive controls, and the PS3 and 360 have too much momentum in the hardcore/"mature"/HD/gritty-realism direction.  You can't just change what your company and your console are about overnight.  Nintendo spent years building the Wii into what it is today, and the PS3 has been fighting that same concept for years.  It might be great tech, and it might even get some amazing games at some point (although none of the launch games have the same wow factor that Wii Sports had in 2006 IMHO), but it won't be a giant paradigm shift that steals the Wii's thunder.  Wii Sports already did that exact paradigm shift, stealing the PS3's thunder.  You can't just... take it back.

heres a little egg. PC has always won the war. and consoles don't win wars. gamers do every gen when good games are released.