yes you can't see anyone but milliband the older taking over labour,
they need to decide what they stand for instead of just ANYTHING BUT TORIES
without blair,brown,campbell,mandelson and being in power things will be very different for labour
UK General Election, Election Day and Results Thread | |||
| New Labour - Gordon Brown | 9 | 17.65% | |
| Conservatives - David Cameron | 15 | 29.41% | |
| Liberal Democrats - Nick Clegg | 21 | 41.18% | |
| UKIP - Lord Pearson | 3 | 5.88% | |
| Green Party - Caroline Lucas | 0 | 0% | |
| Others (National Parties,... | 3 | 5.88% | |
| Total: | 51 | ||
yes you can't see anyone but milliband the older taking over labour,
they need to decide what they stand for instead of just ANYTHING BUT TORIES
without blair,brown,campbell,mandelson and being in power things will be very different for labour
SciFiBoy said:
she said already on BBC News that she wont be standing for the new leader. most of the money seems to be on David Milliband. |
Three days is a long time in politics also, I did mention temporary.


Kantor said:
Very different. We started complaining when Tony Blair started messing up. Cameron hasn't done anything yet. And Tony Blair was hardly the victim of cries of "Fuck off back to Eton, you rich-loving git", now was he? |
oh come off it, its politics, people always complain, dont bullshit and pretend that you dont get angry when your Party does badly, everyone does it, its a human reaction.
and people shouldnt say things like that, but hey, its a free county aint it?
just to make sure there is no confusion here, I did not and do not like Tony Blair, Gordon Brown or New Labour.
| zuvuyeay said: yes you can't see anyone but milliband the older taking over labour, they need to decide what they stand for instead of just ANYTHING BUT TORIES without blair,brown,campbell,mandelson and being in power things will be very different for labour |
I'm not sure about that, actually. A fresh face did wonders for the Tories, and would have done wonders for the Lib Dems if Clegg had any idea how to run a country. Gordon Brown's face is certainly not fresh. Miliband's is more so, but he's part of the Old New Labour party 
SciFiBoy said:
oh come off it, its politics, people always complain, dont bullshit and pretend that you dont get angry when your Party does badly, everyone does it, its a human reaction. and people shouldnt say things like that, but hey, its a free county aint it? just to make sure there is no confusion here, I did not and do not like Tony Blair, Gordon Brown or New Labour. |
Alright, fine. People complained, but to begin with, the internet was pretty much non-existent then. And this is a different scenario, because Blair got 450 seats and Cameron got 306. But I agree with what Kowenicki is saying about how irritating it is that idiots like many of the people currently trashing Cameron are doing so because they think he's some sort of poor-person-hanging give-them-cake power-to-the-rich Old Tory.
Kantor said:
Alright, fine. People complained, but to begin with, the internet was pretty much non-existent then. And this is a different scenario, because Blair got 450 seats and Cameron got 306. But I agree with what Kowenicki is saying about how irritating it is that idiots like many of the people currently trashing Cameron are doing so because they think he's some sort of poor-person-hanging give-them-cake power-to-the-rich Old Tory. |
fair enough, I dont like him because of his/his parties policies and because I think he comes off as smarmy and arrogant, two attributes which rarely endear me to anyone.
as for him as PM, time will tell, I certainly have many reservations.
Kantor said:
I'm not sure about that, actually. A fresh face did wonders for the Tories, and would have done wonders for the Lib Dems if Clegg had any idea how to run a country. Gordon Brown's face is certainly not fresh. Miliband's is more so, but he's part of the Old New Labour party |
thats true milliband might get the job done,
but NEW labour is now gone,is it now OLD labour,labour,NEW OLD labour or OLD NEW labour.....
They should rename themselves, from New Labour to Nu Labour, be like all hip and stuff.
With Mandy as leader.
Golden age, I tells ya.
Hmm, pie.
| The Fury said: They should rename themselves, from New Labour to Nu Labour, be like all hip and stuff. With Mandy as leader. Golden age, I tells ya. |
good one
Nu Labor,wassup votez
so clegg is deputy PM,wow how is all that going to work
it said on rolling news that 5 year fixed term,like it was new,isn't that what it is or does it mean they can't call for a new election if it goes wrong i didn't quite get it all
| zuvuyeay said:
Nu Labor,wassup votez so clegg is deputy PM,wow how is all that going to work it said on rolling news that 5 year fixed term,like it was new,isn't that what it is or does it mean they can't call for a new election if it goes wrong i didn't quite get it all
|
They is obviously down wid the kidz, yo.
I'd hate a 5 year fixed term, too long but having a 'maximum' term would be better, so a party can call it in 4 or even 3 years if they want.
Hmm, pie.