By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - No More Heroes on HD consoles has pretty good first week in Japan

well, my opinion on this game is this:

do i think its a good game? YES

would i buy a Wii for this game? NO

would i buy the game for my PS3? YES


The same goes for Dead Space: Extraction, and MadWorld



“It appeared that there had even been demonstrations to thank Big Brother for raising the chocolate ration to twenty grams a week. And only yesterday, he reflected, it had been announced that the ration was to be reduced to twenty grams a week. Was it possible that they could swallow that, after only twenty-four hours? Yes, they swallowed it.”

- George Orwell, ‘1984’

Around the Network
greenmedic88 said:
jarrod said:
greenmedic88 said:
When a port of a 2 year old game sells better than the original did, that means something. I won't venture to say what it means, but generally speaking, that's not normal.

Indeed!

 

[PS2] Monster Hunter G (Capcom) 232,239

[Wii] Monster Hunter G (Capcom) 236,020

 

 

...clearly, this must mean something!

Monster Hunter IS better suited for the Wii market.

By the same assessment, games like NMH are better suited for the PS3 and Xbox 360, without even lumping both platforms together and claiming it sold over 2X as much for a 2+ year old game.

Isn't this what most people have been saying here?

At least those who aren't trying to shift the argument to claim that a couple of ports cost more than the original game, making the original a better commercial success, making it better suited for the Wii platform?

And games like Monster Hunter?  High budget, big brand, brutally difficult, densely complex, definitively hardcore, co-op based online games?   Those are inherently better suited to the Wii market?  Really?

As to the rest, I doubt anyone's seriously implying the original was a better commercial success due to Japanese sales.  All I've really seen in here is people with any grasp of reason pointing out that Japanese sales for all versions are pretty pitiful, and alone likely aren't enough to make a return.  I'd say that's a pretty safe guess, despite Grasshopper's notoriously low budgeting or feelplus's sloppily rushed up-ports, whichever ended up being slightly less.



jarrod said:
greenmedic88 said:
jarrod said:
greenmedic88 said:
When a port of a 2 year old game sells better than the original did, that means something. I won't venture to say what it means, but generally speaking, that's not normal.

Indeed!

 

[PS2] Monster Hunter G (Capcom) 232,239

[Wii] Monster Hunter G (Capcom) 236,020

 

 

...clearly, this must mean something!

Monster Hunter IS better suited for the Wii market.

By the same assessment, games like NMH are better suited for the PS3 and Xbox 360, without even lumping both platforms together and claiming it sold over 2X as much for a 2+ year old game.

Isn't this what most people have been saying here?

At least those who aren't trying to shift the argument to claim that a couple of ports cost more than the original game, making the original a better commercial success, making it better suited for the Wii platform?

And games like Monster Hunter?  High budget, big brand, brutally difficult, densely complex, definitively hardcore, co-op based online games?   Those are inherently better suited to the Wii market?  Really?

I would say the Wii hardware is better suited for online gaming than the PS2. Considering the Wii comes with networking hardware and data can be saved on SD cards.

It wasn't until 2004 when they made consoles with networking ports but then they removed the friggin hard drive support. Its a shame Sony dropped the ball with Online gaming for the PS2.



Recently Completed
River City: Rival Showdown
for 3DS (3/5) - River City: Tokyo Rumble for 3DS (4/5) - Zelda: BotW for Wii U (5/5) - Zelda: BotW for Switch (5/5) - Zelda: Link's Awakening for Switch (4/5) - Rage 2 for X1X (4/5) - Rage for 360 (3/5) - Streets of Rage 4 for X1/PC (4/5) - Gears 5 for X1X (5/5) - Mortal Kombat 11 for X1X (5/5) - Doom 64 for N64 (emulator) (3/5) - Crackdown 3 for X1S/X1X (4/5) - Infinity Blade III - for iPad 4 (3/5) - Infinity Blade II - for iPad 4 (4/5) - Infinity Blade - for iPad 4 (4/5) - Wolfenstein: The Old Blood for X1 (3/5) - Assassin's Creed: Origins for X1 (3/5) - Uncharted: Lost Legacy for PS4 (4/5) - EA UFC 3 for X1 (4/5) - Doom for X1 (4/5) - Titanfall 2 for X1 (4/5) - Super Mario 3D World for Wii U (4/5) - South Park: The Stick of Truth for X1 BC (4/5) - Call of Duty: WWII for X1 (4/5) -Wolfenstein II for X1 - (4/5) - Dead or Alive: Dimensions for 3DS (4/5) - Marvel vs Capcom: Infinite for X1 (3/5) - Halo Wars 2 for X1/PC (4/5) - Halo Wars: DE for X1 (4/5) - Tekken 7 for X1 (4/5) - Injustice 2 for X1 (4/5) - Yakuza 5 for PS3 (3/5) - Battlefield 1 (Campaign) for X1 (3/5) - Assassin's Creed: Syndicate for X1 (4/5) - Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare for X1 (4/5) - Call of Duty: MW Remastered for X1 (4/5) - Donkey Kong Country Returns for 3DS (4/5) - Forza Horizon 3 for X1 (5/5)

Porcupine_I said:
well, my opinion on this game is this:

do i think its a good game? YES

would i buy a Wii for this game? NO

would i buy the game for my PS3? YES


The same goes for Dead Space: Extraction, and MadWorld

This!!!! makes absolutely no sense at all O.o I mean, if it is the same game, why wouldn't you buy it for the wii?

 



Maynard_Tool said:
Porcupine_I said:
well, my opinion on this game is this:

do i think its a good game? YES

would i buy a Wii for this game? NO

would i buy the game for my PS3? YES


The same goes for Dead Space: Extraction, and MadWorld

This!!!! makes absolutely no sense at all O.o I mean, if it is the same game, why wouldn't you buy it for the wii?

 

Some people don't like the waggle?



Recently Completed
River City: Rival Showdown
for 3DS (3/5) - River City: Tokyo Rumble for 3DS (4/5) - Zelda: BotW for Wii U (5/5) - Zelda: BotW for Switch (5/5) - Zelda: Link's Awakening for Switch (4/5) - Rage 2 for X1X (4/5) - Rage for 360 (3/5) - Streets of Rage 4 for X1/PC (4/5) - Gears 5 for X1X (5/5) - Mortal Kombat 11 for X1X (5/5) - Doom 64 for N64 (emulator) (3/5) - Crackdown 3 for X1S/X1X (4/5) - Infinity Blade III - for iPad 4 (3/5) - Infinity Blade II - for iPad 4 (4/5) - Infinity Blade - for iPad 4 (4/5) - Wolfenstein: The Old Blood for X1 (3/5) - Assassin's Creed: Origins for X1 (3/5) - Uncharted: Lost Legacy for PS4 (4/5) - EA UFC 3 for X1 (4/5) - Doom for X1 (4/5) - Titanfall 2 for X1 (4/5) - Super Mario 3D World for Wii U (4/5) - South Park: The Stick of Truth for X1 BC (4/5) - Call of Duty: WWII for X1 (4/5) -Wolfenstein II for X1 - (4/5) - Dead or Alive: Dimensions for 3DS (4/5) - Marvel vs Capcom: Infinite for X1 (3/5) - Halo Wars 2 for X1/PC (4/5) - Halo Wars: DE for X1 (4/5) - Tekken 7 for X1 (4/5) - Injustice 2 for X1 (4/5) - Yakuza 5 for PS3 (3/5) - Battlefield 1 (Campaign) for X1 (3/5) - Assassin's Creed: Syndicate for X1 (4/5) - Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare for X1 (4/5) - Call of Duty: MW Remastered for X1 (4/5) - Donkey Kong Country Returns for 3DS (4/5) - Forza Horizon 3 for X1 (5/5)

Around the Network

Really? Well on the first one, the motion was minimal, I still don't have the second one, so I don't know about that one.

But if the waggle is the problem.... i don't think is a huge deal



It's not that they don't like waggle. It's the Wii.



Mr Puggsly said:
jarrod said:
greenmedic88 said:
jarrod said:
greenmedic88 said:
When a port of a 2 year old game sells better than the original did, that means something. I won't venture to say what it means, but generally speaking, that's not normal.

Indeed!

 

[PS2] Monster Hunter G (Capcom) 232,239

[Wii] Monster Hunter G (Capcom) 236,020

 

 

...clearly, this must mean something!

Monster Hunter IS better suited for the Wii market.

By the same assessment, games like NMH are better suited for the PS3 and Xbox 360, without even lumping both platforms together and claiming it sold over 2X as much for a 2+ year old game.

Isn't this what most people have been saying here?

At least those who aren't trying to shift the argument to claim that a couple of ports cost more than the original game, making the original a better commercial success, making it better suited for the Wii platform?

And games like Monster Hunter?  High budget, big brand, brutally difficult, densely complex, definitively hardcore, co-op based online games?   Those are inherently better suited to the Wii market?  Really?

I would say the Wii hardware is better suited for online gaming than the PS2. Considering the Wii comes with networking hardware and data can be saved on SD cards.

It wasn't until 2004 when they made consoles with networking ports but then they removed the friggin hard drive support. Its a shame Sony dropped the ball with Online gaming for the PS2.

Monster Hunter doesn't demand mass storage (ie: SD cards, HDDs, etc).  It's dlc (quest, armor, weapons) could've been done easily on PS2 memory cards (and was).  

Monster Hunter also didn't release until 2004, which was when the PS2 started coming with a network adapter built in.



I usually use these threads as an opportunity to rip into people for making stupid posts, but I'm showing mercy today because the situation is just so sad. Japan does not support NMH. You can spin these sales all you want, they ported this game to the supposed super-hardcore platforms, dolled it up and managed to get only a 3k difference per platform despite increased costs and more brand awareness (and this depends on the tracker). It did not outsell the Wii version in total and the first week sales are nothing to write home about if you're not pumped up on fanboy adrenaline.

Fact of the matter is that Japan was never key audience for this series. There's a reason we have NMH2 and they don't. All this says is that Japan is not a healthy market for NMH. You can argue up and down where it "belongs" but this has no impact on anything. Suda wasn't invlved, Grasshopper wasn't involved and a western release hasn't even been announced. If your skin is so deeply infused with irrational bias that a Wiimote burns your hands like acid upon touch, this outcome is only mildly good news to you at best: your only chances of playing any NMH game is a 2 year late port, possibly not even considered for release in your country. For everybody else, they can just buy the game at the source.



Tag - "No trolling on my watch!"

jarrod said:
Mr Puggsly said:
jarrod said:
greenmedic88 said:
jarrod said:
greenmedic88 said:
When a port of a 2 year old game sells better than the original did, that means something. I won't venture to say what it means, but generally speaking, that's not normal.

Indeed!

 

[PS2] Monster Hunter G (Capcom) 232,239

[Wii] Monster Hunter G (Capcom) 236,020

 

 

...clearly, this must mean something!

Monster Hunter IS better suited for the Wii market.

By the same assessment, games like NMH are better suited for the PS3 and Xbox 360, without even lumping both platforms together and claiming it sold over 2X as much for a 2+ year old game.

Isn't this what most people have been saying here?

At least those who aren't trying to shift the argument to claim that a couple of ports cost more than the original game, making the original a better commercial success, making it better suited for the Wii platform?

And games like Monster Hunter?  High budget, big brand, brutally difficult, densely complex, definitively hardcore, co-op based online games?   Those are inherently better suited to the Wii market?  Really?

I would say the Wii hardware is better suited for online gaming than the PS2. Considering the Wii comes with networking hardware and data can be saved on SD cards.

It wasn't until 2004 when they made consoles with networking ports but then they removed the friggin hard drive support. Its a shame Sony dropped the ball with Online gaming for the PS2.

Monster Hunter doesn't demand mass storage (ie: SD cards, HDDs, etc).  It's dlc (quest, armor, weapons) could've been done easily on PS2 memory cards (and was).  

Monster Hunter also didn't release until 2004, which was when the PS2 started coming with a network adapter built in.

PS2 memory cards were only like 8MB. You can't keep much DLC or updates in that.

While the PS2 Slims had networking built in, the masses already owned a PS2 fat with no networking built in. To the contrary, every Wii has networking hardware built in.

Ultimately, the Wii was designed for online gaming on day one. The PS2 wasn't. Therefore the Wii is "better suited" for online gaming. That has a lot to do with why Monster Hunter performed better on the Wii.



Recently Completed
River City: Rival Showdown
for 3DS (3/5) - River City: Tokyo Rumble for 3DS (4/5) - Zelda: BotW for Wii U (5/5) - Zelda: BotW for Switch (5/5) - Zelda: Link's Awakening for Switch (4/5) - Rage 2 for X1X (4/5) - Rage for 360 (3/5) - Streets of Rage 4 for X1/PC (4/5) - Gears 5 for X1X (5/5) - Mortal Kombat 11 for X1X (5/5) - Doom 64 for N64 (emulator) (3/5) - Crackdown 3 for X1S/X1X (4/5) - Infinity Blade III - for iPad 4 (3/5) - Infinity Blade II - for iPad 4 (4/5) - Infinity Blade - for iPad 4 (4/5) - Wolfenstein: The Old Blood for X1 (3/5) - Assassin's Creed: Origins for X1 (3/5) - Uncharted: Lost Legacy for PS4 (4/5) - EA UFC 3 for X1 (4/5) - Doom for X1 (4/5) - Titanfall 2 for X1 (4/5) - Super Mario 3D World for Wii U (4/5) - South Park: The Stick of Truth for X1 BC (4/5) - Call of Duty: WWII for X1 (4/5) -Wolfenstein II for X1 - (4/5) - Dead or Alive: Dimensions for 3DS (4/5) - Marvel vs Capcom: Infinite for X1 (3/5) - Halo Wars 2 for X1/PC (4/5) - Halo Wars: DE for X1 (4/5) - Tekken 7 for X1 (4/5) - Injustice 2 for X1 (4/5) - Yakuza 5 for PS3 (3/5) - Battlefield 1 (Campaign) for X1 (3/5) - Assassin's Creed: Syndicate for X1 (4/5) - Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare for X1 (4/5) - Call of Duty: MW Remastered for X1 (4/5) - Donkey Kong Country Returns for 3DS (4/5) - Forza Horizon 3 for X1 (5/5)