By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft - MS really excited about THQ Natal title.

Squilliam said:
supercat said:
Squilliam said:
supercat said:

-expensive would be anything over $50 in my estimation, and that's for a casual style game which would never be a primary reason for getting a game console but a secondary or tertiary one

 

-Why would a natal kind of game require a cinematic background and picture?  It probably wont if anything, the biggest cost would be from the gameplay programming most likely because that is so foreign to coders

 

-I thnk that you misunderstand, I am saying that Natal games look to be more casual oriented, and no I dont need to define anything because casual games are like porn - You know it when you see it.

It'll likely be $50 or at worst $60 with a game. It would only cost a hell of a lot if Microsoft didn't provide libraries/tools to use and developers had to make their own. Luckily this isn't the case. What Natal games have you seen?

Everything with the promo videos looks like a casual game.  Furthermore, the dropped game cliffclimber or whatever was classic casual. 

 

Also, it certainly could be just $50, but this has expensive development and technology but I doubt that.  Even if you are correct, the price that MS will ask for natal with a game, if $60 would be a fair discount from the production costs and you know that MS will also have to factor in the development costs somehow.  Video cameras, ones that do advanced stuff for consumer electronics aren't going to be cheap to whip out. 

Two months away from E3 you can wait for games. In any case Fable 3 isn't a casual game.

What basis does you speculation lead you to believe that over 10M+ units the average cost of Natal will be considerably higher than $45 to make? The magic of the device is in the software which costs precisely $0 per unit sold.

 

You are distorting things, the games are expensive to code for due to increased complexity, and that price will likely be reflected within natal depending on how much MS views natal as part of their future.  IF this is going to be a big part, they wont mind discounting it.  If a small part, they absolutely would mind discounting things, and would rather the project be profitable and so would give it a higher price.  I'm personally somewhere in the middle, and am giving $60 without a game included but that's just me. 

 

 

Here's a quote by SCEA's rob dyer that allude to high development costs for natal:

 

 



Around the Network
supercat said:
Squilliam said:

Two months away from E3 you can wait for games. In any case Fable 3 isn't a casual game.

What basis does you speculation lead you to believe that over 10M+ units the average cost of Natal will be considerably higher than $45 to make? The magic of the device is in the software which costs precisely $0 per unit sold.

 

You are distorting things, the games are expensive to code for due to increased complexity, and that price will likely be reflected within natal depending on how much MS views natal as part of their future.  IF this is going to be a big part, they wont mind discounting it.  If a small part, they absolutely would mind discounting things, and would rather the project be profitable and so would give it a higher price.  I'm personally somewhere in the middle, and am giving $60 without a game included but that's just me. 

 

 

Here's a quote by SCEA's rob dyer that allude to high development costs for natal:

 

 

Ok, if it cost more than 5% additional to the overall cost of the project I would be shocked and thats what I would consider to be a very high estimate. That is, I doubt it'd cost more than $1M to implement so not a big deal. Its the art work which costs 65-75% of the current budgets for development.

As for Natal, Microsoft has given every indication they want every Xbox 360 to have one of these devices. This means it has to be cheap enough to bundle and cheap enough to buy seperately.

 



Tease.

Every 360? that's overhype dude. A lot of 360 owners like shooters. Why would MS want these to pay for the kind of thing that they wouldn't like as much? But whatever, the 360 isn't my console of choice so I could care less if they make bad decisions. Again, you're being pretty overly optimistic here.



It's going to being a port of Deadly Creatures.

Crawling around on the ground like a spider or scorpion will be wicked!



Proud member of the SONIC SUPPORT SQUAD

Tag "Sorry man. Someone pissed in my Wheaties."

"There are like ten games a year that sell over a million units."  High Voltage CEO -  Eric Nofsinger

Did you just use a Sony executive's comments as a source of information about a MS device?



Around the Network
Aion said:
Great watch it be a AAA title.

Never use the term AAA title when refering to a motion control game, it just doesn't work, the only time I would accept a motion control game to be called a AAA title is if it has Zelda in the name...



JaggedSac said:
Did you just use a Sony executive's comments as a source of information about a MS device?


I don't need to be a Sony excecutive to know that.



JaggedSac said:
Did you just use a Sony executive's comments as a source of information about a MS device?

You know sony would never say anything bad about the opposition.

Now if MS was to say something about the wand you wouldn't be able to use that.

What would MS know about a rival product?



Sounds like its Awesome lol



supercat said:
Every 360? that's overhype dude. A lot of 360 owners like shooters. Why would MS want these to pay for the kind of thing that they wouldn't like as much? But whatever, the 360 isn't my console of choice so I could care less if they make bad decisions. Again, you're being pretty overly optimistic here.

Who says there won't be Natal shooters ?

There was already Half-Life 2 Natal gameplay footage (probably alpha or early beta)

And yes MS want every 360 owner to buy Natal, but they won't achieve that of course. Doesn't mean anything that Squilliam said is overhyped though.