By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Halo Reach versus Killzone 2 HD screenshot comparison

Comparison 1:



In this round we will compare how the two games match up from the normal view which is the first person view. This view gives us a good idea on how the guns are modeled like the depth of chasis and the display panels. The first thing that really catches the eye is the gun that the protagonist is holding. I am not sure at which resolution will the final game be running at but the guns look bland. I mean if you compare the gun in the Killzone 2 screen shot below, the depth, the corners and the other details have been modeled in an amazing way. Even if you look at the digital display on the gun, it looks very low resolution, whereas the one in Killzone 2 has the real “lens” effect. Just as a general first impression Halo Reach doesn’t seem to impress me visually in the first person mode.

Comparison 2:



In this round we will compare the bad guys. The Helghast were an amazing breed of villains in Killzone not just visually but also how their artificial intelligence was handled by Guerilla games. Visually they look threatening; the bombs belt around their shoulders, the red menacing eyes and the shadow effect on their clothes and the body is jaw dropping. Also their guns are immaculately detailed and complete with overall superior animations. The enemies in Halo Reach look as good. If you take a closer look, these guys are fighting out in the open and smaller details like the sun shining on the armor, the tongues coming out of their ugly jaws and the way the hair is rendered goes a long way in making this screen shot visually appealing. In this round Halo Reach ties in with Killzone 2.

Comparison 3:



In this round we will compare the infrastructure as found in both of the games. The one thing I really liked about this Halo Reach screenshot is the attention to smaller details. The setting here is an industrial place and all the objects which you will normally find in such a place is present. The cranes, smoke coming out of the chimney and the gas flowing below the bridge. This particular screen shot is very impressive due to the relation of the objects and it’s setting. So how does Killzone 2 compare? The setting here is on a train. And to be honest this screen shot has the amazing details that the entire game had but it doesn’t really have the wow factor as compared to Halo Reach. The overall design is very good but the rendering of the objects from the top view is low resolution as compared to Halo Reach.

Comparison 4:



This round will give us a good idea on how your team mates and other things like ground surface and background objects are modeled. Killzone looks amazing in this one; the IAS guy looks to be superbly modeled with his gears and guns nicely detailed as well. Even the ground surfaces don’t look bland and objects in the background don’t look low resolution. It’s raining in the image and the fog effect in the background makes the screenshot much better. On the other hand, Halo reach despite having some great character models, doesn’t truly shine on the rendering of the ground surface (looks like an “Xbox1” ground). The background objects are OK but they really don’t gel along with the mountains especially the complex behind the tree. It’s a no brainer on who is winning here.

Judging by the screen shots above, Killzone 2 is a better looking game. But Bungie still has time to up the ante. Let us know what you think in the comments section below.

 

http://gamingbolt.com/2010/02/14/halo-reach-versus-killzone-2-hd-screenshot-comparison/



Around the Network

"Killzone 2 greatest First Person Shooter Ever made"

ummm no



EMULATION is the past.....NOW.......B_E_L_I_E_V_E

 

 


KZ2 is a mile ahead(BASED ON THE FOOTAGE I SAW OF HALO REACH)

and those screens do neither game justice.



 

mM

I'll be kind to you and simply state that there is no point comparing a released game to alpha/beta build footage of another game that we don't even know if its running on stock 360 hardware.

At least the article is fairly unbiased in its judgement from what I read though for a change. What is surprising is just how well Halo Reach stands up against Killzone 2, its quite the leap in visuals on the engine from Halo 3 for it now to be considered even worth comparing to KZ2, one of the best looking games out there.



Comparing a pre-alpha build of a game against a final build is a little ridiculous.



Around the Network
darklich13 said:
"Killzone 2 greatest First Person Shooter Ever made"

ummm no


lol i no, uncharted 2 is



Well...

One has been released for close to a year.

One is being released in a fair few month.


This is an unfair comparison.



                            

....

Well...let's see...

Those pics don't do justice...to either game.

I also feel this thread was made to bait folks.

**Why are you comparing a finished game to a game that has only shown Alpha build stuff???**

We already know that Reach won't be as grphx as KZ2..and for many reasons...Do note that reach has to run 4x on a single console..where as KZ2 does not...and then factor in sandbox enviroments.

If KZ2 was truly the king of fps..it's sales would refeclt that...which they don't.



A biased opinion at it's finest. Everything about this article is a joke. This site should be banned from being referenced on VGChartz.



Follow Me: twitter.com/alkamiststar

Watch Me: youtube.com/alkamiststar

Play Along: XBL & SEN : AlkamistStar

sully1311 said:
darklich13 said:
"Killzone 2 greatest First Person Shooter Ever made"

ummm no


lol i no, uncharted 2 is

no....no it isn't.....