By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Assassins Creed GOTY?

Lost tears of Kain on 17 November 2007
whatever said:
Lost tears of Kain said:
IGN was rediculas on their review, and their UK one pissed me off like no other

a 4 on gameplay, for the love of fuck what is wrong with them.

Ive only fully agreed with IGN reviews a few times, and now i know why.

Actually it looks like they got it right.  There are 6 scores lower than theirs, including some in the 60's.

Its just not that good of a game.  Get over it. 


And theres 7 in the 90s, making Game informers and GT scores right on par as well.

Seriously have you played it, if not you have ZERO say in this and can go away.

Again a 4 on gameplay is rediculas, even if its not varied, which its not. But the few weapons you ger are very deep, and im 15 hours into the game and still having a blast



                 With regard to Call of Duty 4 having an ultra short single player campaign, I guess it may well have been due to the size limitations of DVD on the XBox 360, one of various limitations multi-platform game designers will have to take into consideration-Mike B   

Proud supporter of all 3 console companys

Proud owner of 360wii and DS/psp              

Game trailers-Halo 3 only dissapointed the people who wanted to be dissapointed.

Bet with Harvey Birdman that Lost Odyssey will sell more then Blue dragon did.
Around the Network
Lost tears of Kain on 17 November 2007
ckmlb said:
Assassin's Creed is great, but varied gameplay? not really.

Yes, variety is the true thing hurting it. That and story, but they did alot of things right, and the wall climbing etc ive never seen done better.

THe combat might be simple with only a few weapons, but its kinda deep. And im still having fun just creating crap in the town and just destroying guys. Im a good 10-15 hours into it, and im only on the 4th assassination, so that should tell you how much fun ive had messing around.



                 With regard to Call of Duty 4 having an ultra short single player campaign, I guess it may well have been due to the size limitations of DVD on the XBox 360, one of various limitations multi-platform game designers will have to take into consideration-Mike B   

Proud supporter of all 3 console companys

Proud owner of 360wii and DS/psp              

Game trailers-Halo 3 only dissapointed the people who wanted to be dissapointed.

Bet with Harvey Birdman that Lost Odyssey will sell more then Blue dragon did.
selnor on 17 November 2007

Apparantly PS3 version has some framerate issues. 360 seems fine tho.



leo-j on 17 November 2007

@selnor

Thats whathappens when you port a game.



 

mM
whatever on 17 November 2007
Lost tears of Kain said:
whatever said:
Lost tears of Kain said:
IGN was rediculas on their review, and their UK one pissed me off like no other

a 4 on gameplay, for the love of fuck what is wrong with them.

Ive only fully agreed with IGN reviews a few times, and now i know why.

Actually it looks like they got it right. There are 6 scores lower than theirs, including some in the 60's.

Its just not that good of a game. Get over it.


And theres 7 in the 90s, making Game informers and GT scores right on par as well.

Seriously have you played it, if not you have ZERO say in this and can go away.

Again a 4 on gameplay is rediculas, even if its not varied, which its not. But the few weapons you ger are very deep, and im 15 hours into the game and still having a blast


So I'm supposed to believe you over a majority of the review sites?  Please.  Its got 5 scores in the 90s and 8 in the 70s or lower.

I'll have as much say in this as I want, thank you.  Now run along and play your game.  Stop being so ridiculous (note the spelling).



Around the Network
Lost tears of Kain on 17 November 2007
whatever said:
Lost tears of Kain said:
whatever said:
Lost tears of Kain said:
IGN was rediculas on their review, and their UK one pissed me off like no other

a 4 on gameplay, for the love of fuck what is wrong with them.

Ive only fully agreed with IGN reviews a few times, and now i know why.

Actually it looks like they got it right. There are 6 scores lower than theirs, including some in the 60's.

Its just not that good of a game. Get over it.


And theres 7 in the 90s, making Game informers and GT scores right on par as well.

Seriously have you played it, if not you have ZERO say in this and can go away.

Again a 4 on gameplay is rediculas, even if its not varied, which its not. But the few weapons you ger are very deep, and im 15 hours into the game and still having a blast


So I'm supposed to believe you over a majority of the review sites?  Please.  Its got 5 scores in the 90s and 8 in the 70s or lower.

I'll have as much say in this as I want, thank you.  Now run along and play your game.  Stop being so ridiculous (note the spelling).

Majority?

7 in 90s, 6 in 80s Thats majority do the math and get your facts right before you post.

http://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/xbox360/assassinscreed

No you wont, you havent played it. Sorry didnt know i was in english class, so i dont check my spelling.

Seriously go away whoever you are.

 



                 With regard to Call of Duty 4 having an ultra short single player campaign, I guess it may well have been due to the size limitations of DVD on the XBox 360, one of various limitations multi-platform game designers will have to take into consideration-Mike B   

Proud supporter of all 3 console companys

Proud owner of 360wii and DS/psp              

Game trailers-Halo 3 only dissapointed the people who wanted to be dissapointed.

Bet with Harvey Birdman that Lost Odyssey will sell more then Blue dragon did.
whatever on 17 November 2007
Lost tears of Kain said:
whatever said:
Lost tears of Kain said:
whatever said:
Lost tears of Kain said:
IGN was rediculas on their review, and their UK one pissed me off like no other

a 4 on gameplay, for the love of fuck what is wrong with them.

Ive only fully agreed with IGN reviews a few times, and now i know why.

Actually it looks like they got it right. There are 6 scores lower than theirs, including some in the 60's.

Its just not that good of a game. Get over it.


And theres 7 in the 90s, making Game informers and GT scores right on par as well.

Seriously have you played it, if not you have ZERO say in this and can go away.

Again a 4 on gameplay is rediculas, even if its not varied, which its not. But the few weapons you ger are very deep, and im 15 hours into the game and still having a blast


So I'm supposed to believe you over a majority of the review sites? Please. Its got 5 scores in the 90s and 8 in the 70s or lower.

I'll have as much say in this as I want, thank you. Now run along and play your game. Stop being so ridiculous (note the spelling).

Majority?

7 in 90s, 6 in 80s Thats majority do the math and get your facts right before you post.

http://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/xbox360/assassinscreed

No you wont, you havent played it. Sorry didnt know i was in english class, so i dont check my spelling.

Seriously go away whoever you are.

 


http://www.gamerankings.com/htmlpages4/930278.asp

8 are higher than 80%.  11 are 80% or lower.  So who is in the majority.  I can do math, get my facts right, and spell.



darconi on 17 November 2007
Lost tears of Kain said:
whatever said:
Lost tears of Kain said:
whatever said:
Lost tears of Kain said:
IGN was rediculas on their review, and their UK one pissed me off like no other

a 4 on gameplay, for the love of fuck what is wrong with them.

Ive only fully agreed with IGN reviews a few times, and now i know why.

Actually it looks like they got it right. There are 6 scores lower than theirs, including some in the 60's.

Its just not that good of a game. Get over it.


And theres 7 in the 90s, making Game informers and GT scores right on par as well.

Seriously have you played it, if not you have ZERO say in this and can go away.

Again a 4 on gameplay is rediculas, even if its not varied, which its not. But the few weapons you ger are very deep, and im 15 hours into the game and still having a blast


So I'm supposed to believe you over a majority of the review sites? Please. Its got 5 scores in the 90s and 8 in the 70s or lower.

I'll have as much say in this as I want, thank you. Now run along and play your game. Stop being so ridiculous (note the spelling).

Majority?

7 in 90s, 6 in 80s Thats majority do the math and get your facts right before you post.

http://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/xbox360/assassinscreed

No you wont, you havent played it. Sorry didnt know i was in english class, so i dont check my spelling.

Seriously go away whoever you are.

 


 Um, he's correct when referring to gamerankings. 

 http://www.gamerankings.com/htmlpages4/930278.asp 

5 in the 90s+, 6 in the 80s, and 8 in the 70s.  Get over it.  You may vastly enjoy the game, nobody's saying you can't but the majority of reviewers do not agree with you.  Happens with many games esp wii games where there's a huge standard deviation in reviews. 

 



Lost tears of Kain on 17 November 2007
darconi said:
Lost tears of Kain said:
whatever said:
Lost tears of Kain said:
whatever said:
Lost tears of Kain said:
IGN was rediculas on their review, and their UK one pissed me off like no other

a 4 on gameplay, for the love of fuck what is wrong with them.

Ive only fully agreed with IGN reviews a few times, and now i know why.

Actually it looks like they got it right. There are 6 scores lower than theirs, including some in the 60's.

Its just not that good of a game. Get over it.


And theres 7 in the 90s, making Game informers and GT scores right on par as well.

Seriously have you played it, if not you have ZERO say in this and can go away.

Again a 4 on gameplay is rediculas, even if its not varied, which its not. But the few weapons you ger are very deep, and im 15 hours into the game and still having a blast


So I'm supposed to believe you over a majority of the review sites? Please. Its got 5 scores in the 90s and 8 in the 70s or lower.

I'll have as much say in this as I want, thank you. Now run along and play your game. Stop being so ridiculous (note the spelling).

Majority?

7 in 90s, 6 in 80s Thats majority do the math and get your facts right before you post.

http://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/xbox360/assassinscreed

No you wont, you havent played it. Sorry didnt know i was in english class, so i dont check my spelling.

Seriously go away whoever you are.

 


 Um, he's correct when referring to gamerankings. 

 http://www.gamerankings.com/htmlpages4/930278.asp 

5 in the 90s+, 6 in the 80s, and 8 in the 70s.  Get over it.  You may vastly enjoy the game, nobody's saying you can't but the majority of reviewers do not agree with you.  Happens with many games esp wii games where there's a huge standard deviation in reviews. 

 


Then that means metacritic has more reviews=makes it more accurate.

I can voice my opinion, dont tell me to get over it.

Again do the math, if you add the 80s and 90s, you clearly have more then the 60s and 70s, making IGNs rating below everyones else (why theres the average). Again do some math, and figure out what we are argueing about.



                 With regard to Call of Duty 4 having an ultra short single player campaign, I guess it may well have been due to the size limitations of DVD on the XBox 360, one of various limitations multi-platform game designers will have to take into consideration-Mike B   

Proud supporter of all 3 console companys

Proud owner of 360wii and DS/psp              

Game trailers-Halo 3 only dissapointed the people who wanted to be dissapointed.

Bet with Harvey Birdman that Lost Odyssey will sell more then Blue dragon did.
whatever on 17 November 2007
Lost tears of Kain said:
 

Then that means metacritic has more reviews=makes it more accurate.

I can voice my opinion, dont tell me to get over it.

Again do the math, if you add the 80s and 90s, you clearly have more then the 60s and 70s, making IGNs rating below everyones else (why theres the average). Again do some math, and figure out what we are argueing about.


I guess you failed at math.  At metacritic, the average is 83, at gamerankings that average is 81.4.  So IGNs score of 77 is closer to the average than any score 90 or above.

The reviews that look ridiculous are the ones that gave it 100%.  I wonder how much Ubisoft paid those sites.