whatever on 17 November 2007
| Lost tears of Kain said: Then that means metacritic has more reviews=makes it more accurate. I can voice my opinion, dont tell me to get over it. Again do the math, if you add the 80s and 90s, you clearly have more then the 60s and 70s, making IGNs rating below everyones else (why theres the average). Again do some math, and figure out what we are argueing about. |
I guess you failed at math. At metacritic, the average is 83, at gamerankings that average is 81.4. So IGNs score of 77 is closer to the average than any score 90 or above.
The reviews that look ridiculous are the ones that gave it 100%. I wonder how much Ubisoft paid those sites.
