Lost tears of Kain said:
whatever said:
Lost tears of Kain said:
whatever said:
Lost tears of Kain said:
IGN was rediculas on their review, and their UK one pissed me off like no other
a 4 on gameplay, for the love of fuck what is wrong with them.
Ive only fully agreed with IGN reviews a few times, and now i know why. |
Actually it looks like they got it right. There are 6 scores lower than theirs, including some in the 60's. Its just not that good of a game. Get over it. |
And theres 7 in the 90s, making Game informers and GT scores right on par as well. Seriously have you played it, if not you have ZERO say in this and can go away. Again a 4 on gameplay is rediculas, even if its not varied, which its not. But the few weapons you ger are very deep, and im 15 hours into the game and still having a blast |
So I'm supposed to believe you over a majority of the review sites? Please. Its got 5 scores in the 90s and 8 in the 70s or lower. I'll have as much say in this as I want, thank you. Now run along and play your game. Stop being so ridiculous (note the spelling). |
Majority? 7 in 90s, 6 in 80s Thats majority do the math and get your facts right before you post. http://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/xbox360/assassinscreed No you wont, you havent played it. Sorry didnt know i was in english class, so i dont check my spelling. Seriously go away whoever you are. |
http://www.gamerankings.com/htmlpages4/930278.asp
8 are higher than 80%. 11 are 80% or lower. So who is in the majority. I can do math, get my facts right, and spell.
