curl-6 said:
Why would they make a dedicated home console when the Switch has been far more successful than any home console they've ever made, and especially more so than any of their power-competitive consoles? That doesn't make it any less illogical to hold a hybrid/portable system to dedicated console standards when the two are fundamentally different. The hybrid form factor is the best path forward for them in terms of remaining successful, and within that form factor the Switch 2 is about as capable as one can reasonably ask for. |
It would be nice, especially now with inflation and tariffs, if Nin at least sold a SW2, console only, no controller, for cheap.
Put the guts of the handheld and dock in a Wii sized (or smaller) shell and sell it for a reasonably cheaper price.
Let customers choose whether to buy the joycons and charger grip or go with the Pro controller instead.
I really don't see how Nin loses with a move like this for their next gen.
PS1 - ! - We must build a console that can alert our enemies.
PS2 - @- We must build a console that offers online living room gaming.
PS3 - #- We must build a console that’s powerful, social, costs and does everything.
PS4 - $- We must build a console that’s affordable, charges for services, and pumps out exclusives.
PRO -%-We must build a console that's VR ready, checkerboard upscales, and sells but a fraction of the money printer.
PS5 - ^ -We must build a console that’s a generational cross product, with RT lighting, and price hiking.
PRO -&- We must build a console that Super Res upscales and continues the cost increases.
