By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
haxxiy said:
LegitHyperbole said:

They changed all that with Tw3, doesn't matter what the books say,this is their universe, their version of Ciri and they, hopefully not, seem to be misunderstanding why people love Ciri in TW3 and to that matter why Geralts subdued indifferent tone works so well for side quests and character interaction in really grounded, high stakes scenarios. 

I'm just pointing out that in terms of how Ciri is represented in published media might be now 8 to 1 in terms of consistency. When book readers or young gamers in 2030 decide to check out what TW3 was about they might find it strange too.

And I haven't seen anyone else with that particular complaint, so you might not be speaking for a lot of people anyway...

I've done more reach into it. The devs say they want to get rid of the neutrality of Gerlalt and add more emotion to choices. I don't feel this is a good move but I trust them.... I suppose, I have to trust them. It just seems like something integral about the quests and stories will be lost, the idea that Geralt was a bystander in place for the player. If they can pull it off, Props to them but I've seen this with Assasins Creed when they tried to copy TW3, it just ruins the magic sauce.