Apparently, there are Republicans threatening terrorist action because of the impeachment.
You're catching these guys on video, and not arresting them?
I describe myself as a little dose of toxic masculinity.
Apparently, there are Republicans threatening terrorist action because of the impeachment.
You're catching these guys on video, and not arresting them?
I describe myself as a little dose of toxic masculinity.
padib said:
I'm Canadian. I have no agenda here, just stating my point of view. How did you get 4 likes without even reading my original post which mentioned that? You hate him, but you are not the democratic majority. That's my point. Keep in mind, the hatred that is shared on all camps of political divide is what created Trump in the first place. If radical left-wing citizens didn't so alienate republicans like you're doing with me (I'm not even a republican for crying out loud), none of this would've happened. You are responsible for your own reality. Here is my reply in the thread I got... redirected to (ugh): http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9087382 |
@bolded Trump lost the popular vote in 2016. More Americans voted against him, than those that voted for him. Republicans lost control of the House in 2018. People that hate (or at least voted against him) have been the majority from before November 2016 up until now. He has never had, and will never have the popular majority support of the American people.
People really need to stop with the whataboutism. What other Presidents did might matter in the larger picture but it doesn't matter with regards to Trump's impeachment. Is Trump's misuse of authority gross enough that he should be considered untrustworthy and removed from office? That should be judged as its own thing.
Personally, in the court of public opinion, I think it's the pattern of abuse that's really troubling, but for a trial, only the charges filed should be considered.
Robert Loudermilk's comments regarding Jesus and Trump have to be the most cringe thing I've ever seen. A sample of the type of mental gymnastics it takes to support Trump.
A lot of effort for something that will simply be rejected once it hits the Senate. Unless someone can actually show evidence of 'High Crimes and Misdemeanors'. Then maybe some Republicans will actually have a reason to impeach.
Locknuts said: A lot of effort for something that will simply be rejected once it hits the Senate. Unless someone can actually show evidence of 'High Crimes and Misdemeanors'. Then maybe some Republicans will actually have a reason to impeach. |
Even if such evidence would be shown, the rebublicans would still let it slip.
Funny enough that an impeached president can even get re-elected.
Intel Core i7 8700K | 32 GB DDR 4 PC 3200 | ROG STRIX Z370-F Gaming | RTX 3090 FE| Crappy Monitor| HTC Vive Pro :3
padib said:
If I'm reading you right, Presidents should be removed from office once they lose popularity (let's say, what 2 years)? That's not how your system works. My main point to Runa is that Trump would not even exit if there was more unity in your country and republicans did not feel like they needed someone to save them from the other extreme (extreme left) and the media brainwash. The two sides need to work more closely together in general, people, politicians, media. That is my issue with all this, the impeachment (as much as Trump's election in the first place) shows a lack of Unity in general in the US and just a lack of meaning in general. In that sense, this is all bad news. |
@Bolded. No, I was merely pointing out that the majority of Americans never wanted him in office to begin with, and they still don't. He lost the popular vote by well over 2 million votes. When another large national election happened in 2018 his party lost control of the house (the portion of Congress that is based on state population).
Or to put it another way: People who want Trump out of office have indeed been the Democratic Majority the entire time, contrary to your post.
You said "You hate him, but you are not the democratic majority. That's my point."
I'm telling you that, that statement is flat out wrong.
zorg1000 said: So only people who openly admit to being racist can be considered racist? Shaking hands with a black person disqualifies one from being racist? |
Given that the corporate media has made open comparisons between Trump and Hitler and his supporters to Nazi's then yes, you should be able to see clear evidence of hatred towards those with different skin colors. If you cannot, then this should lead you to seriously question the honesty of the corporate media and whether you should trust anything it tells you in the future including the details of this impeachment.
Illusion said:
Given that the corporate media has made open comparisons between Trump and Hitler and his supporters to Nazi's then yes, you should be able to see clear evidence of hatred towards those with different skin colors. If you cannot, then this should lead you to seriously question the honesty of the corporate media and whether you should trust anything it tells you in the future including the details of this impeachment. |
Hitler/Nazi comparisons are over the top but I'm pretty sure a user just gave sources of the racist/discriminatory things he has done.
When the herd loses its way, the shepard must kill the bull that leads them astray.
Locknuts said: A lot of effort for something that will simply be rejected once it hits the Senate. Unless someone can actually show evidence of 'High Crimes and Misdemeanors'. Then maybe some Republicans will actually have a reason to impeach. |
There is already ample evidence of impeachable conduct. Republicans just don't care.