Why are you mentioning Maduro? Are you sure you know what you're talking about? First get the name of the leader right. Second the American funded OAS said the Bolivian election was rigged before it even ended and no proof has been found from any source, only an illegitimate claim by a biased organization. The Americans who hate the Bolivian leader whose name you don't seem to remember fund the OAS so the bias is easy to know and understand. Other independent organisations didn't find any proof of that claim. Just like the lie about WMDs and the lie about chemical weapons attacks in Syria. And go read independent media not funded by large US corporations who love capitalism because it benefits them so much and hate socialism because it will affect their bottomline.

Go read the intercept for one. Research what code pink does. Why do you trust CNN, BBC, MSNBC or WaPo or new York times? They have blatantly lied about Bernie Sanders so why should you trust them? They are clearly biased because capitalism benefits them a lot and many of their tv personalities are millionaires because of it and they are owned by large media conglomerates that benefit them. Show me that same conflict of interest in the intercept.

That's why I trust different news sources for different stories, RT is not gonna say something negative about Russia but they will have no problem reporting truths that are anti-american. Al Jazeera might not tell the whole truth about Qatar, but they do a fine job on almost anything else, hell might be the best of the bunch. CNN might lie when US imperialist Corporatist interests are involved but they might be the best source on other stories. I consider biases when reading the stories and take what news papers and other news sources feed me with a huge grain of salt and then make my own judgement. Can't say the same for you since you can't even get the leader right. 

Next time ask yourself why CNN would tell the truth about Syria or Bolivia? Why would RT not tell the truth about something that makes the US look bad. What motive would code pink have for standing against US imperialism other than just being against US imperialism. Why would Assange leak bad stuff about Russia if he is working with Russians. Why would WikiLeaks be filled with info on all countries indiscriminately if he works for one of those countries? I know it's easier to buy the US imperialist propaganda but looking at all stories from all angles and making your decision based on that is the best policy. Get as much data as you have time for. That's how I know.

And my team as you say is humanity. I make my politics centered on what helps the list people, not selfish old me, unlike the US government. And it's not a conspiracy theory that the US has invaded countries, democratic countries just for supporting USSR or thinking about socialism or communism. It's in history books. Ask a historian about that and manifest destiny. I condemn any country invading a sovereign nation that has a different political belief system than you solely because of money, power and a superiority complex. The US has caused much harm to the world and this is just the latest example. This is class warfare and the rich did start this class warfare long before either of us were born. Anyone who chooses money and power over people is my enemy. I just realised what the best system for humanity is and I just have the privilege of knowing the hypocrisy of world leaders all over and not buying the propaganda of any one nation like you gobble up western imperialism. 

The plain simple fact is that the US had NEARLY NOTHING to do with the coup. The US was at it's most a cheerleader on the side so the military came to the decision independent of US stance ... 

Nothing is going to change the fact that Evo Morales is a criminal who dodged the justice system and just like Peru's former president who also attempted to escape from the justice system ... 

Evo Morales needs to be extradited and brought into court to face trial just like every other civilized country out there. What Evo Morales showed was a display of cowardice to avoid facing the rule of law, not bravery unlike the others you mentioned (aside from MBS) who won't hide from their courts when necessary ... 

Oh yeah, its morales.Sorry, confused one dictator with another.

But your wall of text is really funny.It all boilds down to "You believe all these big news outlets?Hah!Fool!You dont know the truth because you dont read/watch/hear the ACTUAL truth from the news outlets that I actually like!" And then you go and name the Intercept, run by the moron Gleen Greenwald(who "clearly"[sarcasm intended] isnt biased for left centric governments, given all the damage he has done in Brazil), which no one takes seriously, as an example of a media(which is western based, ironically lol) thats "serious" about journalism.

And there iss also all that garbage about US imperialism and how they want to just to disrupt America... I mean, every country wants to be number one, and sometimes they dont play nice to reach that, but cmon.Anyone reading what you wrote here knows that just conspiracy theory nonsense.

And with that, Im done.Since you clearly dont bring anything relevant and that has a shred of truth to it, not to mention that you simply ignored the fact in your wall of text about Morales rigging the election(The part that you dismiss the external organization jut because its supported by the US(Im trusting you on this) is simply hilarious.Not to mention that the Bolivian entities also proved the fraud), its pretty clear who won the argument.

Oh, and I dont watch/read US centric news source.Not everyone is american you know.And wanna know what?Everyone says the same thing:Morales was a dictator, and that election was a fraud.

The irony, trump and Netenyahu are literally trying everything not to face the rule of law and I'm sure Modhi, MBS and Bolsanaro would do the same. And it does have something to do with the US. Without US support, the military of Bolivia wouldn't dare do the coup. A coup and bought out court isn't facing justice, it's facing a massacre. If you think the US doesn't have anything to do with this other than being a cheerleader, you're an Idiot. There's probably CIA agents standing side by side with Bolivian military making sure everything goes according to plan. The US has done this countless times. Do you want to happen to Morales what happened to Gaddafi? Because that's not justice, that's US's warning to anyone who goes against the empire and the petrodollar. You guys are so privileged you have no idea how global politics work. 

As for Trump or Netanyahu, it's for the Republicans and the Likud respectively to decide their fates in the courts. A similar deal holds for Modi, Bolsanaro, & etc aside from MBS who lives in a state of absolute monarchy ... 

The US couldn't really give too shits about Bolivia specifically since to them they're one of the many other illiberal democracies out there. US 'support' is nothing more than mere 'words' and everything else from then on is a conspiracy theory. Consider this, there was NO EVIDENCE PHYSICAL PRESENCE of American intervention in Bolivia so you accusing CIA agents standing side by side with the Bolivian military is #FAKENEWS ... 

Many of those leaders you've mentioned will be properly scrutinized by the rule of law and may even face a real possibility of going to prison like Netanyahu but can you truly say the same thing for Evo Morales who is currently hiding in cowardice from the law ? When is Evo Morales going to come into the light to face judgement ? Who is going to determine whether his actions were righteous or not ? You ?

Sorry but you don't understand Islam, Christianity or jihad. All you have is what the media fed to you, what your western centric narrative tells you and some loose definition of words and phrases you have never even tried understanding

Also brutal dictatorships that murder protestors  and destroy democracy fascist? Then what is?

This guy can't even get the name of the leader right. He keeps saying Maduro

Did the courts indict Evo Morales? No. Who did? The new right wing official under the military's express instructions. That's not facing justice, that's facing death. You keep mentioning justice but forget the military told him to resign, not any legal channel. What's happening in Bolivia is 100% extrajudicial so what law is he facing? Not the Bolivian law but maybe martial law. Netenyahu has been investigated by a neutral party under normal circumstances of the Israeli law. Likud will not decide his fate, the courts will. Trump is facing impeachment, the most constitutional thing a Congress can do. Imagine if the US military asked Donald Trump to resign? There is not justice with Morales returning home, only an unjust extrajudicial death. I can't believe the hypocrisy of you people who supposedly support democracy and rule of law. NO PHYSICAL EVIDENCE of election rigging in Bolivia exists as well. And no one indicted hi, under normal regular channels of Bolivian law. I don't have proof of CIA you're right but call it past experience with how CIA does it's dealings. Decades from now when no one cares, unclassified documents will show what the truth is. 

OTBWY was defending Maduro.But thats neither here or there.

All I ever said is that she is very likely to be better than Maduro(whcih isnt hard, mind you), simply because she is 1 week in in her new job, leading a country thats beyond broke.

Me and Donferrari are no extremists, and probably neither are you guys.It just baffles me that, because we are "celebrating" the fall of a dictator basically by the peoples demand(again, the people wanted him out, the military just gave him an ultimatum.And lets be honest, given the fraudulent election, he would never have left the power otherwise).

And just out of the curiosity:What would you call what Maduro did rigging the elections?Democracy?