Better than living in your shit worldview.  You obviously have nothing.  Just wait till Trumps defeat and you can go grab your AR15 like the rest of your group.

You are, but why would you admit it? No, instead you'd rather deflect to asking me if I'd let my daughter date him. Good on you. As expected of someone who goes by the name "Machiavellian". Now put those goalposts back.

He didn't say maybe. He said he assumes some are good people among those coming into the country illegally. Out of context or in this conversation if you said "maybe your mom is not a whore", then you'd probably get a warning or a ban. Now, a discussion concerning a rise in prostitution among 50-60 women that included that? I'd assume it meant you didn't think my mom was a whore.

What's that? A comment on a Trump policy instead of just calling him racist? Color me surprised. I'm not an economist, but I would assume the President of the United States (who has shown in the past that he defers to the wisdom of people who know what they're doing, such as with his chance from a wall to a fence at the suggestion of border control) would probably have a guy in his cabinet who knows a little more about economics than I, a dip who just gets exhausted from all the Trump Anxiety people try to spread, or you, a guy who thought the name Machiavellian was a good faith name for someone arguing politics.

And then a 180 back to the inane. What's amoral about a wall? What about their plans are stupid? How are they idiots? Are you just going to throw a bunch of insults around and make an attempt at moral posturing, or are you going to make a point?

And again, insults. This time without the moral posturing at least, but now it's just insults. "Trump's plans are bad because he's dumb". Great argument, genius, I'm totally convinced.

"A con job". I suppose that's a better argument than "he dumb".

A quick google into that one about the Steel Industry shows a back-and-forth between Trump and never-Trump that I don't care to get into. There are reports from October that show surges, and reports of "insiders" from January that clash with what Trump claims... Seems like something worthy of a discussion, but it doesn't seem like something I would drop into a "Trump bad" column so readily.

Can you? Because you've really only made one solid point about trade tariffs another another hot-take point about the nuance currently surrounding the steel industry. Instead, you just called him and his administration dumb a lot, which makes it seem more like you watch Maddow a lot rather than actual news. It seems your homework comes from one kind of source rather than a spread of sources, and the result is the thought process that insulting someone a lot makes you correct. Which would make you more like Trump than you'd probably like to admit.

And for the record, I voted for Bernie and never watched any of Trump's shows. I knew the "you're fired" meme and that he was in Home Alone, but that was the extent of my knowledge concerning Trump before he was elected. I just get tired of the Trump Derangement Syndrome that the media has stirred up in people. It was annoying when Fox did it to Obama, and it's even more annoying when everyone else does it to Trump. Argue policies and research statements. An insult isn't a valid substitution for an argument.

"In addition, Trump will be paying “possessory interest” taxes to the District of Columbia. Trump has also applied to the Internal Revenue Service for a 20 percent federal preservation tax credit on money spent on the renovation."

"(The “possessory interest” tax is in lieu of property tax, since the building will continue to be federally owned and therefore exempted from Washington property taxes. This is something the district created in 2000 to obtain money from private entities conducting business on tax-exempt government-owned properties. This tax is calculated at the same rate as Washington’s commercial property tax based on assessed value. At this time, it is difficult to say what that would be.)"

Maybe instead of the best deal, they should have made a worse deal for the people, or flat out torn it down like they originally wanted to?

The Democrats are going to have to stop being so divided if they hope to beat Trump in 2020. They're already moving in like vultures on their most popular candidate (Biden).

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-emoluments-idUSKCN1S72YL

If he was smart he would have put his businesses in a blind trust.  Now he can face the wrath of courts.  Maybe this time he won't wiggle his way out of it.

Yep that's the problem with us.  USA is void of any actual leaders and Democrats are barely any better than GOP.  If you ask me both parties suck.  Multiparty proportional representation all the way...  I was born in the wrong country obviously.

Unfortunate that this one is going to have to wait until after impeachment, whenever that takes place...

I guess this means he won't be moving forward with his future plans.

"As if restoring the Old Post Office were not enough, the Trumps also have their eyes on the Federal Bureau of Investigation building a block away, on the opposite side of Pennsylvania Avenue. The General Services Administration is looking to turn over the Brutalist building to a developer in return for land elsewhere in the area on which to build a new F.B.I. headquarters."

“We’ve been looking at that closely,” Ms. Trump said. “Our first priority is the Old Post Office, but there is tremendous potential with the F.B.I.”

Election night 2020 is going to be lit.

I was in North Carolina for a business trip during the 2016 election and watched the results from my hotel room frantically texting back and forth with coworkers and friends. We knew that he was going to poll far better than anyone assumed, however, seeing state after state being called for him made me realize the energy at his rallies I attended wasn't unique to the midwest.

He's going to win again. The Democrats overplayed their hand with everything from Russia to Kavanaugh. They thought acting like him would resonate with voters. But the person they tried (and continue) to emulate is nothing more than a caricature of who trump is and why his supporters continue backing him up. They'll continue to ramp up what they think Trump is and do nothing but alienate voters who would otherwise be open to their positions. All of this, I completely support.

youtube could use another round of talking heads and overly emotional people freaking out at his reelection.

Looks like Democrats are happy enough to just try to oust through elections.  Impeachments take forever and it is only a year and half till elections.  Look how long it took Kenn Starr to investigate Clinton about getting his dick sucked.  Of course he opened up investigations about other dealings with Clintons.  If Clinton's were guilty either  Kenn Starr sucks at investigating or somehow they pulled a fast one.  Trump is whining about being investigated yet Clinton's had just as much or more scrutiny.  Remember stupid Benghazi?  They looked forever yet couldn't come up with shit.  Whatever they did come up with is about as credible as Saddam buying yellow cake uranium from Nigeria.  We all know how that ended.  Pure bs to go into Iraq to finish what GWB Jr thought his daddy didn't with a little backrub from Dick Cheney.  Halliburton no bid contracts awarded to them not because Cheney was former CEO.  It's because they were only private company that could do it right?

So instead of 'justice' for the American people, they are only going to use this to smear, yet let this and everything else slide? Maybe going after him for these things could backfire like the majority of other attempts so far and hurt their campaigns? Now that's a group of individuals you want running your Government!