By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony Discussion - Playstation Classic Announced, releasing in December 3rd with 20 games pre-loaded and cost $99

Uhm...I hope Sony corrects the main limit of the NES/SNES mini: the lack of a digital store to expand your library.



Around the Network

Wow lots of negative comments in here from ppl who have no intention of buying it.

If you don’t like it or don’t want it, don’t buy it. And don’t come in here posting hateful comments.

On topic, I’ve got mine preordered. Can’t wait. :)



Ljink96 said:
Harkins1721 said:

How so exactly? The name makes sense. Sony had patents in circulation about the PS Wand before the Wii was even out. 

And you are aware that Nintendo didn't have Wii patents before the PS Wand? Come on... And if they really cared about the "PS Wand" they would have taken the Wii technology that was shopped around to Sony and Microsoft (which they laughed away) before coming to Nintendo and Nintendo accepted the idea. We don't know exactly when a device was conceived or prototyped, only finished and that's all that matters in the technological world. Nobody remembers Xerox for the computer mouse...do they?

I'm not saying the name doesn't make sense....that's not my argument. My argument is that it's unoriginal and cheesy due to the fact its coming out right after the NES and SNES Classic. I thought Sony wanted to do everything they could to be different from Nintendo. You don't come out with a console like this, have the same suffix as your rival and don't expect people to point it out. I mean really, as rivals they were just asking for it. 

But this has gone on too long...if you feel it isn't a bit embarrassing, who am I to tell you you're wrong. This is how I feel about it. 

Nintendo has mastered the act of taking something existing and turning it into a success. That's not a bad thing but stop pretending like Nintendo invented everything while every other company copied them.

Let's move on from the "it's embarrassing/sad/laughable/etc." comments, shall we?



alejollorente10 said:
flashfire926 said:
https://www.vg247.com/2017/06/05/why-would-anybody-play-this-says-sonys-jim-ryan-about-backwards-compatibility/

Hypocrisy at it's finest.

This is glorious. Added to the already famous "we will never be like Nintendo."

https://gamerant.com/xbox-playstation-classic-reaction/

XB poking/bashing PS and the PS classic for not allowing full BC on their existing platform. Not a word about Nin though. I wonder why?



dx11332sega said:
PAOerfulone said:
So, how much longer until we see an OG Xbox Classic?

The excitement in me and a OG Xbox I'm certain they'll add Panzer Dragoon orta , jet set radio future, kotor 1 and 2 midtown madness, conker, Shenmue 2,halo 1 and 2

What I'm hoping Bloody roar , dead or alive , WWE, freedom fighter, project gotham racing, sonic heroes, fable , crazy taxi 3 , morrowind , jade empire ? 

Shikamaru and other die hard xbox fans has a better list for this than me .

https://gamerant.com/xbox-playstation-classic-reaction/

After what XB said here, it wouldn't look so great on them to release a classic/mini. Then again, PS have done exactly that, and they've all backtracked or 180'd over the years so.



Around the Network
Replicant said:
Ljink96 said:

And you are aware that Nintendo didn't have Wii patents before the PS Wand? Come on... And if they really cared about the "PS Wand" they would have taken the Wii technology that was shopped around to Sony and Microsoft (which they laughed away) before coming to Nintendo and Nintendo accepted the idea. We don't know exactly when a device was conceived or prototyped, only finished and that's all that matters in the technological world. Nobody remembers Xerox for the computer mouse...do they?

I'm not saying the name doesn't make sense....that's not my argument. My argument is that it's unoriginal and cheesy due to the fact its coming out right after the NES and SNES Classic. I thought Sony wanted to do everything they could to be different from Nintendo. You don't come out with a console like this, have the same suffix as your rival and don't expect people to point it out. I mean really, as rivals they were just asking for it. 

But this has gone on too long...if you feel it isn't a bit embarrassing, who am I to tell you you're wrong. This is how I feel about it. 

Nintendo has mastered the act of taking something existing and turning it into a success. That's not a bad thing but stop pretending like Nintendo invented everything while every other company copied them.

Let's move on from the "it's embarrassing/sad/laughable/etc." comments, shall we?

Did I say Nintendo invented everything? You're now putting words in my mouth just to prove your point. I didn't say Nintendo Invented anything... and no, I'll continue to say it's embarrassing because that's how I feel about it. Like I said, you don't make something like this, a rival, competitor device, with the same naming scheme and don't expect people to point it out. You're bringing up facts that I'm not arguing to make a point in an argument I didn't make. It doesn't work like that...



Yeah. Can we stop debating about who invented what/when and stop using terms like "Clony". - Keep the discussion on topic and civil if we can.



--::{PC Gaming Master Race}::--

Sweet! I'm hoping we get Parasite Eve, Dino Crisis, one of the classic Tomb Raider games (preferably 2), Legacy of Kain, MGS1, and one of the Twisted Metal games on there.



i dont know... $100 is steep, and the ps1 games dont hold up very well, have you seen any recently? it changed my mind about it.

though if i could put loaded, and reloaded on it, maybe? run around syphon filter and taser guys until they are smoking for a few minutes.. tony hawk might get me to move on it... its a big maybe.



 

Ljink96 said:
Replicant said:

Nintendo has mastered the act of taking something existing and turning it into a success. That's not a bad thing but stop pretending like Nintendo invented everything while every other company copied them.

Let's move on from the "it's embarrassing/sad/laughable/etc." comments, shall we?

Did I say Nintendo invented everything? You're now putting words in my mouth just to prove your point. I didn't say Nintendo Invented anything... and no, I'll continue to say it's embarrassing because that's how I feel about it. Like I said, you don't make something like this, a rival, competitor device, with the same naming scheme and don't expect people to point it out. You're bringing up facts that I'm not arguing to make a point in an argument I didn't make. It doesn't work like that...

Well, so far you've only been in this thread to bitch about how Sony copied Nintendo's use of the word "Classic". If that's not an example of the awfully "Nintendo invented everything", I don't know what is.

That'd literally be akin to derail a thread just to call Nintendo "embarrassing, unoriginal and cheesy" because they named their online service Nintendo "Network" – the same naming scheme used by the rivaling PlayStation "Network". Do you see how dumb that is?

2006

 

2012

It's fine that you think it's embarrassing, but stop derailing the damn thread. Can we have a single thread about something PlayStation related that isn't driven into the ground?