By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Movies & TV - The Fans Have Spoken, Last Jedi Drops A Massive 68%

Nem said:
Soundwave said:

All that shit should have been in The Force Awakens, that's not on Rian Johnson to stop his movie and now have to explain 50 different things because the movie that should have dealt with most that crap (TFA) just had to be "oooh it's a mystery" for every freaking damn thing. He already had to put in a broader fleshing out of what happens to Luke and Ben and I thought that was actually fairly clever how he twisted it a bit (nice Kurosawa homage also). 

The prequels don't make sense half of the fucking time. Who's Syfo Dyas? Where does he comes from? Does Attack of the Clones (IN FILM, none of that cartoon show bullshit) address that even though it's an entire plot line? Nope. An entire movie is spent on Obi-Wan snooping around for that and then they just drop it, lol. Who's Count Dooku really? What does he really want? I still have no fucking idea, and don't give me the "watch the cartoon show" crap, that should be in the film. Who's General Greivous? Where the fuck did he come from? What the hell does the Trade Federation actually want? None of this is clearly explained in those films, so gimme a break. Why do the Jedi not question how like 10 million clone troops just magically show up?

Luke being the way Luke is is not something Rian Johnson made up, that was established by JJ Abrams, Luke bails out on his friends and goes running off to an island doing nothing while the First Order takes over because his Jedi academy was massacred. That's said straight up by Han Solo. 

Beyond that the same concept for Luke was established even by Lucas before even JJ Abrams was on the project, that art is in The Art of TLJ book, so Luke being a hermit that runs away to an island while the galaxy suffers was always part of the story. 

To me The Force Awakens and Last Jedi are fairly even in quality. Flawed, but I think I prefer TLJ more because it's a bit darker of a film. Better than the prequels which are just a cartoon but below the OT by a good amount. 

The biggest problem with TLJ script is that it has too many characters and that cuts down on the compelling parts of it which are the Rey + Luke and Rey + Kylo sequences. Those parts of the movie work and work very well, the performances are good. There's DRA-MA there, not just nerd shit answers/fanboy wanking (that doesn't make a movie), Rian needed to stick to give those parts of the movie more screen time and all the Rose/Finn/Poe/Leia subplots less screen time.

That's where the setting makes sense. Syfa dias was a jedi master, dooku was an apprentice of Palpatine, but after the prequels pretty much every jedi died and the only Sith was palpatine. So, this snoke guy makes no sense without some explanation.

Btw i agree that that stuff should be in episode 7 and that is why i disliked it. I don't think the problem is TLJ but the whole thing. This new trilogy feels like a different dimension where the empire was never defeated. It's a can of nonsense. 

I still don't know what these "shit answers" are you are talking about, but theres also the highperspeed jump cutting things in half. That came out of nowhere. I think you are trying to attack something that is legitimate. I guess after the first movie it was "this stuff will get explained later". Now that they see it won't everyone woke up from the trance. xD

Syfo-Dias was actually Sydo-Dias or something in the original conception of Attack of the Clones, Lucas realized it was too stupid though because that obviously meant Sidious and it was too on the nose. The Clone Wars TV show then made it into an actual seperate character, but the story arc never went anywhere under Lucas he just wanted Obi-Wan to be a detective for 40 minutes of a movie. 

I'm looking at movies through "where's the drama? Is the conflict interesting? Is the story surprising?" you know basic *storytelling* stuff not fanboy indulgement. That's not real storytelling. On that end I thought TLJ was alright. The mistake the script makes is it spends too much time on superfluous characters instead of staying with Luke-Rey-Kylo, any scene with one of those three characters I found very interesting, the other stuff kinda feels like it's there because it Star Wars and you have to have B/C-plot with other characters just cuz Star Wars. 

Snoke's backstory should've been in The Force Awakens. Even if there's a line there where they go "Oh Snoke was a dark side user who lived in the Outer Rim and consolidated power after the Emperor died" (which probably is the basic jist of his story) I guess .... so? I mean suddenly is the movie 5x better with that in it? I'm glad they didn't do that Darth Plagueis stupidity. 

We didn't know where the heck Palpatine came from or who he was in the OT, he just suddenly showed up. 



Around the Network
Soundwave said:
Nem said:

That's where the setting makes sense. Syfa dias was a jedi master, dooku was an apprentice of Palpatine, but after the prequels pretty much every jedi died and the only Sith was palpatine. So, this snoke guy makes no sense without some explanation.

Btw i agree that that stuff should be in episode 7 and that is why i disliked it. I don't think the problem is TLJ but the whole thing. This new trilogy feels like a different dimension where the empire was never defeated. It's a can of nonsense. 

I still don't know what these "shit answers" are you are talking about, but theres also the highperspeed jump cutting things in half. That came out of nowhere. I think you are trying to attack something that is legitimate. I guess after the first movie it was "this stuff will get explained later". Now that they see it won't everyone woke up from the trance. xD

Syfo-Dias was actually Sydo-Dias or something in the original conception of Attack of the Clones, Lucas realized it was too stupid though because that obviously meant Sidious and it was too on the nose. The Clone Wars TV show then made it into an actual seperate character, but the story arc never went anywhere under Lucas he just wanted Obi-Wan to be a detective for 40 minutes of a movie. 

I'm looking at movies through "where's the drama? Is the conflict interesting? Is the story surprising?" you know basic *storytelling* stuff not fanboy indulgement. That's not real storytelling. On that end I thought TLJ was alright. The mistake the script makes is it spends too much time on superfluous characters instead of staying with Luke-Rey-Kylo, any scene with one of those three characters I found very interesting, the other stuff kinda feels like it's there because it Star Wars and you have to have B/C-plot with other characters just cuz Star Wars. 

Snoke's backstory should've been in The Force Awakens. Even if there's a line there where they go "Oh Snoke was a dark side user who lived in the Outer Rim and consolidated power after the Emperor died" (which probably is the basic jist of his story) I guess .... so? I mean suddenly is the movie 5x better with that in it? I'm glad they didn't do that Darth Plagueis stupidity. 

We didn't know where the heck Palpatine came from or who he was in the OT, he just suddenly showed up. 

I can't really forgive Johnson turning a bunch of key characters into superfluous characters, in his own script. The only advice I have for focusing on them is "stop hitting yourself."

Palpatine showing up in the OG trilogy is explained the prequels, and the OG trilogy films are the prequels to the new trilogy. Ergo, Johnson should have borrowed from source material that explained it or explained it himself. It's not like Lucas started with IV-VI and didn't have an explanation: he didn't have the visual effects to start with I-III.

Also, the books were better.



Insidb said:
Soundwave said:

Syfo-Dias was actually Sydo-Dias or something in the original conception of Attack of the Clones, Lucas realized it was too stupid though because that obviously meant Sidious and it was too on the nose. The Clone Wars TV show then made it into an actual seperate character, but the story arc never went anywhere under Lucas he just wanted Obi-Wan to be a detective for 40 minutes of a movie. 

I'm looking at movies through "where's the drama? Is the conflict interesting? Is the story surprising?" you know basic *storytelling* stuff not fanboy indulgement. That's not real storytelling. On that end I thought TLJ was alright. The mistake the script makes is it spends too much time on superfluous characters instead of staying with Luke-Rey-Kylo, any scene with one of those three characters I found very interesting, the other stuff kinda feels like it's there because it Star Wars and you have to have B/C-plot with other characters just cuz Star Wars. 

Snoke's backstory should've been in The Force Awakens. Even if there's a line there where they go "Oh Snoke was a dark side user who lived in the Outer Rim and consolidated power after the Emperor died" (which probably is the basic jist of his story) I guess .... so? I mean suddenly is the movie 5x better with that in it? I'm glad they didn't do that Darth Plagueis stupidity. 

We didn't know where the heck Palpatine came from or who he was in the OT, he just suddenly showed up. 

I can't really forgive Johnson turning a bunch of key characters into superfluous characters, in his own script. The only advice I have for focusing on them is "stop hitting yourself."

Palpatine showing up in the OG trilogy is explained the prequels, and the OG trilogy films are the prequels to the new trilogy. Ergo, Johnson should have borrowed from source material that explained it or explained it himself. It's not like Lucas started with IV-VI and didn't have an explanation: he didn't have the visual effects to start with I-III.

Also, the books were better.

We didn't have the prequels for like 20 years, lol, and believe me Star Wars was much better off before them. 

Lucas made most of his shit up on the fly, researching how the OT was done, he just turned Leia into Luke's sister way later on and the earliest drafts of Empire Strikes Back does not have Darth Vader as Luke's father (Anakin is a separate character that even shows up as a Force ghost to talk to Luke, lol). 



Soundwave said:
Insidb said:

I can't really forgive Johnson turning a bunch of key characters into superfluous characters, in his own script. The only advice I have for focusing on them is "stop hitting yourself."

Palpatine showing up in the OG trilogy is explained the prequels, and the OG trilogy films are the prequels to the new trilogy. Ergo, Johnson should have borrowed from source material that explained it or explained it himself. It's not like Lucas started with IV-VI and didn't have an explanation: he didn't have the visual effects to start with I-III.

Also, the books were better.

We didn't have the prequels for like 20 years, lol, and believe me Star Wars was much better off before them. 

I don't have to believe you: I was there, and Lucas should have never helmed them.

If he handed off most of the directorial duties, a la IV-VI, he'd probably still own the franchise.



Insidb said:
Soundwave said:

We didn't have the prequels for like 20 years, lol, and believe me Star Wars was much better off before them. 

I don't have to believe you: I was there, and Lucas should have never helmed them.

If he handed off most of the directorial duties, a la IV-VI, he'd probably still own the franchise.

He sold to Disney because he was getting old and wouldn't be able to run the company forever and didn't want to lay off his Lucasfilm/ILM staff. 

That's a separate issue. The prequels were still dog shit though, lol. 



Around the Network

I imagine that after Episode 9, this thread will still be active with how much these people detest this movie



The Emperor didn't need to be explained in the OT - the Empire were the villains, ergo we have an Emperor helming it. Vader serves him, so he's probably super OP. He wants Vader to find Luke to become his new apprentice, and decides to kill him when he declines after revealing he has a sister (another potential convert).

Snoke, on the other hand...he comes out of nowhere in chapter #7, with a whole fleet, ultimate WMD, and sith (?) underling (whom he decides on a whim shouldn't wear a mask because reasons). He's got some fancy force tricks, his fleet recovers instantly from having the incredibly expensive WMD blown up, doesn't know his fleet has the ability to track through hyperspace, wants Rey initially to turn her...and then decides killing her & Luke is a better plan because reasons, and then dies like a chump.



arcaneguyver said:

The Emperor didn't need to be explained in the OT - the Empire were the villains, ergo we have an Emperor helming it. Vader serves him, so he's probably super OP. He wants Vader to find Luke to become his new apprentice, and decides to kill him when he declines after revealing he has a sister (another potential convert).

Snoke, on the other hand...he comes out of nowhere in chapter #7, with a whole fleet, ultimate WMD, and sith (?) underling (whom he decides on a whim shouldn't wear a mask because reasons). He's got some fancy force tricks, his fleet recovers instantly from having the incredibly expensive WMD blown up, doesn't know his fleet has the ability to track through hyperspace, wants Rey initially to turn her...and then decides killing her & Luke is a better plan because reasons, and then dies like a chump.

I think it's pretty obvious the First Order is just the Empire rebuilt, it's not some entire new fleet. 

That said yes, they could have had a better explanation on it, but ultimately it doesn't really change the movie and that should have been in The Force Awakens, not The Last Jedi. Presumably he is some evil dude that took over the vacuum of power left after the Emperor and Vader were dead. It doesn't really matter where he came from, just that he did rise to power as a Dark Side user and took over the Empire. 

 



This is apparently Snoke's backstory via Wookiepedia:

Snoke was a humanoid alien who was the leader of the Attendants, a retinue composed of mute alien navigators who originated from the Unknown Regions. At some unspecified point in his life, Snoke acquired a black obsidian stone from the catacombs and mines beneath the castle of the Sith Lord Darth Vader on the planet Mustafar. He affixed the stone to a golden ring he wore, which was engraved with glyphs used by the Four Sages of Dwartii,[8] controversial figures of philosophy from the early days of the Galactic Republic and were represented with bronzium statues in the office of Supreme Chancellor Sheev Palpatine.[9]

Eventually, Snoke witnessed the rise and eventual fall of the Galactic Empire.[1] Through a secret Contingency, however, many former Imperial officers, nobles and technologists fled to the Unknown Regions and took the shape of what eventually became the First Order. Most of the former Imperial officers would have likely perished while crossing this uncharted realm, if it had not been for the ancient hyperspace trails blazed by Snoke's retinue, along with some of Grand Admiral Thrawn's vast knowledge about the Regions, which helped them to stay there and organize themselves.[10][11]

Although he was a very powerful practitioner of the dark side of the Force, Snoke was not affiliated with the Sith, which became extinct as a result of the deaths of Darth Sidious and Darth Vader at the Death Star II thanks to the efforts of the Jedi Knight Luke Skywalker. As such, Snoke, a secretive master of the Force, was a seeker of arcane and ancient lore.[8][12][13] In a matter of time, Snoke became unexpectedly the leader of the First Order. The last of the Imperial leadership, including Grand Admiral Rae Sloane, the political lunatic Ormes Apolin or even General Brendol Hux didn't see Snoke's rise to power and were surprised when it occurred. General Armitage Hux, Brendol's son, was spared by Snoke in order to use him as a tool in his rise to power.[14]


So basically after ROTJ a bunch of the Imperials go running off into the "Unknown Regions" which Admiral Thrawn knows well. There they "regroup" and run into an old Dark Side user named Snoke. They reform into the First Order and consolidate the former Empire. 

I mean ... yeah. I think Rian Johnson actually said he shot a bit where this is talked about in the movie, but it doesn't really advance the actual plot of The Last Jedi.



Soundwave said:
Insidb said:

I don't have to believe you: I was there, and Lucas should have never helmed them.

If he handed off most of the directorial duties, a la IV-VI, he'd probably still own the franchise.

He sold to Disney because he was getting old and wouldn't be able to run the company forever and didn't want to lay off his Lucasfilm/ILM staff. 

That's a separate issue. The prequels were still dog shit though, lol. 

The more control he had, the worse the films turned out. He made too much money to be challenged on the prequels, unfortunately.

It's a double-edged sword: Lucas' comic directing vs. losing Star Wars canon.