fatslob-:O said:
All of these examples you mentioned had occurred before WWII where we're supposed to know better in the age of information and Israel is by the very definition straight up imperialist, more so than Russia which says a lot. You also must not know a lot about early history of the US if that's how you think anglophones expanded the territory because the vast majority of native americans were eliminated through small pox and not through force ...
There are no historical documents about either the Kingdom of Israel or Judah ever having existed so their history cannot be preserved but there are historical documents of the Ottoman empire having claim to the territory for nearly 400 years which was an Islamic centric body so by historic religious rights the palestinians have more claim to Israel than the jews themselves! Israel is flat out an artificial state created by both the UN and the British mandate and has only existed for nearly 70 years so the Jewish aren't taking back anything, their just been handed territory only to take more of the arabs given share ...
You can at least attest to the fact that Israel is unjustly occupying the originally allotted palestinian land, no ? Do you really want another situation like China/Tibet where the more powerful state is bullying the weaker state ? On what other grounds do you think that the land that the jews have taken is theirs and where is justice for the palestinians that have been robbed of the land that they were given ?
Are you seriously implicating genocide with your last paragraph ?! Let me be clear that is the thought process of Nazi's that would ironically be running through Israel ...
|
I'm amazed how easily you try to get away from the issue by excuses that don't really make much sense: Examples taken before WW2, As if an imaginary line makes stuff before WW2 ok and magically not ok right after WW2, very convenient to justify your anti-Jewish argument.
Indians eliminated by smallpox. Wow you must feel so good about America having invaded Indian territory cause smallpox is the bad guy, not the good white settlers who took a land unoccupied by Indians...
And finally Israel and their ancient kingdoms did not exist, they were just made up? How convenient... Except there are documents attesting to their existence, history, monuments too. I can't believe you are trying to undo history just to accommodate your pro-palestiniant views. That's what they call revisionism, when people deny history to justify something. Kind of like those who say that Hitler never killed the Jews in the concentration camps.
If you need to undo history to justify your side of the argument then as far as I am concerned you have no argument.
At least that last part of your comment can be discussed (cause up to now, it's just a cop-out and revisionism) so about Israel occupying palestinian land, well it's FAIR. 1 Because it is historically their land... Oh right, you changed history to avoid this, ok fine let's move on to the next argument: it's STILL fair, cause after the UN allocated land to the Jews in 1947 (or will you say that did not happen too?) after that, the Arabs ATTACKED Israel with the intent of DESTROYING Israel for the ONLY reason that a NON muslim nation was born in the MIDDLE of what is purely a muslim area (how nice and tolerant of them, right?) and while NEVER at peace with the Jews, the Arabs attacked AGAIN in 1967, this time all together, palestinians, Egypt, Lebanon, Jordan, Syria etc... to murder all Jews to the last man, woman and child...
But they failed cause Israel was (and as I argued before can ONLY be militarily powerful or they would have ceased to exist back in those days) victorious, in 6 days they crippled the enemy armies and as a totally JUSTIFIED punishment, took some land as buffer zones. Let me repeat this very important part: Arabs attacked to destroy every last Jew in Israel. Israel attacked to defend and took SOME land as a very justified punishment. Do you see the difference? Taking some land and trying to commit genocide as the muslims tried is quite different in my book.
After that, the palestinians had their excuse to commit more violence and whine to the world oooooh the mean Israelis took our land from us good palestinians for no reason, boooh... After that it was a permanent guerilla warfare and terrorism, rocket launches to try to randomly murder Jews, shot from Gaza and the West bank, terrorists blowing themselves up in buses and public places in Israel. And you seriously suggest that land should be returned to those barbarians? Israel in my opinion is weak and does not go far enough. The only true solution is to kick all palestinians out of at least the West Bank and take that territory who was ANYWAY Jewish land to begin with. If there are no palestinians there, there won't be any attacks coming from there, simple logic. As for palestinians, when you see the HUGE lands around Israel, it's all muslim land and they could settle in so many places out there and live peacefully (if peace was what those people really wanted). Unfortunately Israel is weak on this issue cause creating buffer zones in the West Bank and only pushing palestinians farther in does not change the malevolent nature of palestinians. You don't defeat a cancerous tumor by reducing it or by putting anti cancer stuff AROUND the tumor, you need to completely eliminate the cancerous tumor in its heart. In other words buffer zones and settlements are not enough. Palestinians need to go to new land of which there is so much choice outside and around Israel.
I know its drastic, I'm not saying it would be easy and would give among guys like you an excuse to hate even more on Israel, but the truth is it is either that or permanent war with palestinians who will NEVER accept Israel. Not when Israel was created and did NOT take any land from Palestinians and NOT now that they have justifiably taken some land.
Sorry but you will not so easily deconstruct my psychology
Last edited by CrazyGamer2017 - on 12 December 2017