DonFerrari said:
First I see unopotainable and thought it was my lack of vocabulary, but the meaning seemed close to unobtainable, is that it? But yes you are right that "real comunism" is unatainable, but even the though of "forcing everyone to be equal" is also wrong... but the phrase in itself is that it's wrong to forcibly take something from someone and give another just that everyone have the same.
No it isn't new... but the comment and spin is valid... if someone complained in the school that a teacher was mocking the heritage of Red necks, KKK, Confederates and etc, the person would probably be told "to fuck off". But in this case just a miss report with ill intetions warranted a summary termination. Yes companies doesn't need to give a reason in Brazil as well (but several cases this type of termination gets invalidated), but when you do give a reason and it seems like any type of prosecution than you may have an issue with the termination. And even thought companies can fire without "reason" there is always a reason, unless the boss is completely obtuse no one fire an employee just for pleasure because that will have an impact on the business... so any inteligent firing have to weight pros and cons, impacts before decided. |
Well Maoist China in the beginning maybe came somewhat close to being a real communist the country. China was devasted by Japan during WWII so it was pretty classless, even before the war there wheren't many rich people in China due to Western colonialism but they still had a currency and having no money is one of the key aspects of real communism. Plus once the opened up to the West, China became quickly very capitalistic. As far as the Soviets go they never really considered themselves true communist even Lenin himself said that they only achieved State Capitalism but not true communism.
