Then the Soviet Union was not opposed to capitalism either since it's economy was run by state capitalist enterprises for the majority of it's history.

That is the slidesloope that will lead to apologetics that claim "comunism was never attempted, so you can't say it gone wrong"

That is the slidesloope that will lead to apologetics that claim "comunism was never attempted, so you can't say it gone wrong"

Again, that's assuming that they actually were attempting communism. The Red Army attacked the Free Territory and re-incorporated it into their territory, despite their socialist structure, while they also signed a Non-Aggression Pact with Nazi Germany, which seems to be against their objectives considering that Nazi Germany were anti-communist and did not want its spread.

They have a point, I suppose. But on the other hand if every attempt at communism causes it to degrade back into capitalism then it shows that communism is not a very practical system.

Again, that's assuming that they actually were attempting communism. The Red Army attacked the Free Territory and re-incorporated it into their territory, despite their socialist structure, while they also signed a Non-Aggression Pact with Nazi Germany, which seems to be against their objectives considering that Nazi Germany were anti-communist and did not want its spread.

This is realpolitik, Ukraine is a valuable territory and signing a NAP with your biggest enemy while that same enemy is killing your other enemies is not a half bad idea. Mao avoided fighting the Japanese to rebuild his manpower and resources while letting the KMT exhaust itself.

While they may be killing other enemies, Nazi Germany also crushed many socialist movements. Of course though, we can't read minds, so we can only interpret their motivations with our own biases.

Socialist movements may not be inherently friendly to the Soviet regime. Moscow was happy as long as it could exert its influence, which it did without much trouble.