Nautilus said:
Azuren said:
Tobacco smoke drifts, and can affect people up to thirty feet away from the smoker depending on wind currents.
I'm allergic to tobacco, so I'm really sensitive to it, and a friend at work has such bad asthma that tobacco smoke shuts down her lungs. Someone was smoking by the exit door, and the smoke traveled all the way to the registers (no small distance, mind you) and we both had to move.
|
Hunter_alien basically answered what I would answer.
I would go one step further and say that if smoking should be banned, then so should taking the dog or a cat outside of the house.If we were to apply that logic, there are myriad humans that are allergic to those animals, and having them outside can be harmful to them(by staying too close, or simply because the animals can leve furs on public spaces, like public chairs and so on).But I do wish your friend good health, I imagine that condition must be really annoying.
My point is, banning things that can be harmful to most people is a good, but we need to reach an agreement.If we were to ban things that are only harmful to us, half of the things most people of the world enjoy would be illegal and we would have wars over it or higher crimes, for better or worse.I mean, look no further than drugs.If people already go to all kinds of lenghts to get their drugs(illegal ones), and causes myriad crimes related to it, imagine if Alcohol were illegal?
Im no smoker, never tried it in my life actually, but I do know that there are people that like it and they help them "escape" the bad situation they are in sometimes.Like alcohol and gambling, they are a necessary evil that humans, persons, needs.And limiting it to designated areas(which are few) and to your own house(which you may not6 even be allowed to, since you have a family and all) is simply too extreme.
|