Because she's a liar and *surprise* her state denied Bernie supporters from helping him win New York. 

He can say that all he wants as he accepts donor money from anybody who gives it. Keep in mind he's transitioned from a "self-"funded primary into a privately funded GE campaign. And even then he barely actually funded himself. He's clearly shifted more towards corporate interests since locking up the nomination, as his donors started pulling the strings more. He's still being Trump, but he would very much be an establishment GOP president if elected, just with a bigger mouth. 

There is tons of change that American conservatives want. For example, the GOP has a platform on reforming government, taxes, immigration ( https://www.gop.com/platform/reforming-government/ ) in it there are dozens of other platforms that qualify as "change." From what I've seen of European conservatives, if there is a change by the opposing party and it works in the benefit of the population, they just accept it as a new thing to be conservative about, but I don't think they are more or less interested in change than American "conservatives", just accept it when it happens and by the nature of their political structures more sweeping changes can occur. 

By the way, seeing America as being more liberal than Europe does not necessarily mean it isn't also more right-wing (on average) than Europe. Liberalism is usually positioned as a center position, for no good reason other than they tend to band with both conservatives and social-democrats/socialists. In the U.S, as I said, it is just the case that we have very few social-democrats (today) and very few true conservatives, and even fewer fascists/nationalists (all Americans are nationalist in a way, but only in a very superficial way: flag waving and inward looking, nothing really political.) It is important to remember that liberalism has nothing to do with change, inherently. At its core it is an ideology about individual rights. While it can be radical, it is hardly the only radical ideology, nor does it have to be (in the U.S it is the norm and status quo, since the country was founded on liberalism.) 

I agree with the bolded. This was a huge semantic discussion really, I just found it funny how bastardized the term liberal is in the U.S that somebody called a "neoliberal" is not considered an actual liberal. 

Anybody that claims to be a Bernie Sanders supporter that now says they will vote for Donald Trump did not understand what Bernie Sanders stands for

How so? They're both Neo liberal capitalists.

Seriously what the F is wrong with some of you.. If you are a Sanders supporter there is no F-ing way you vote for Trump.

I'm honestly assuming the person who coined it in the American sense just straight up defined it himself not realizing it was a real term! 

Wow that's so much worse than Donald trump.  Boo hoo.  Seriously if Americans vote in trump as a protest to Clinton the United States has reached a new low and deserves the wrath of trump.  I'll feel absolutely no sympathy for you. 

No, I wont vote for Hillary. I will vote for someone else.

 Or Hillary...