GOWTLOZ said:
GoOnKid said:
It's definitely way better than reviewers claim it to be and the multiplayer is fantastic. Too bad that reviewers only care about shiny graphics while ignoring the fun factor and ignoring what this game was supposed to be. And too bad that so many players blindly follow the reviewers without opening up their mind themselves. These are sad news but they were inevitable.
|
Reviewers only care about graphics? Is that why The Order 1886 has 67 metacritic, and so many Wii U games are highly rated?
C'mon man. I've seen the game in motion and its one of the most horrid games in terms of everything, from my experience not a single redeemable quality in this game.
|
Well, the graphics are what reviewers criticized the most and the harshest. And yes, that's why the Order 1886 got that high because the graphics are that games' only value considering it mostly plays itself apart of some shooting sequences. I'm not downplaying it since there are surely many players who like just that, but that's not my cup.
Devil's Third wanted to deliver seamless transitions between tps and fps, and that's exactly what it achieved. If anyone doesn't like the setting, the story, the b-movie flair, the cheesy one-liners, the ranked missions, the collectibles, the references to other media, the great soundtrack, the challenging difficulty, the insanely crazy mp modes, or Jane Doe's ass, then that's all hardly debatable since all of that is personal taste, I guess.
Your last paragraph is your opinion, my opinion differs. I liked it so much that I finished it four times till now. I wonder if anybody ever finished The Order even twice.